Cut-off points of homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, beta-cell function, and fasting serum insulin to identify future type 2 diabetes: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study

被引:128
作者
Ghasemi, Asghar [1 ,2 ]
Tohidi, Maryam [3 ]
Derakhshan, Arash [3 ]
Hasheminia, Mitra [3 ]
Azizi, Fereidoun [2 ]
Hadaegh, Farzad [3 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Res Inst Endocrine Sci, Endocrine Physiol Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Res Inst Endocrine Sci, Endocrine Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[3] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Res Inst Endocrine Sci, Prevent Metab Disorder Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Cut-off points; HOMA-IR; HOMA-B; HOMA-S; Insulin resistance; Type; 2; diabetes; Epidemiology; METABOLIC SYNDROME; VISCERAL FAT; HOMA-IR; RISK; SENSITIVITY; POPULATION; SECRETION; INDEXES; VALUES; INDIVIDUALS;
D O I
10.1007/s00592-015-0730-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Aims To determine cut-off points of homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), beta-cell function (HOMA-B), insulin sensitivity (HOMA-S), and fasting insulin for identifying the subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Iranian adults using data from a prospective population-based study. Methods From participants of Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study, 4942 Iranian subjects, aged 20-86 years, were followed for incident T2DM. Fasting serum insulin was determined by the electrochemiluminescence immunoasaay. The associations between HOMA-IR, HOMA-B, HOMA-S, and fasting insulin and incident T2DM were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models. The receiver operator characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the cut-off points of HOMA-IR, HOMA-B, HOMA-S, and fasting insulin. Results After 9.2 year follow-up, 346 (7.0 %) incident cases of T2DM were identified; the risk-factor-adjusted hazard ratios for HOMA1-IR, HOMA2-IR, HOMA1-B, HOMA2-B, HOMA1-S, HOMA2-S, and insulin were 1.15, 1.70, 0.732, 0.997, 0.974, 0.986, and 1.01 in women and 1.37, 1.67, 0.588, 0.993, 0.986, 0.991, and 1.06 in men, respectively (all p < 0.05 except for HOMA2-B in women). Optimal cut-off points for HOMA1-IR, HOMA2-IR, HOMA1-B, HOMA2-B, HOMA1-S, HOMA2-S, and insulin were 1.85, 1.41, 86.2, 72.5, 54.1, 63.7, and 11.13 A mu U/ml in women and 2.17, 1.18, 67.1, 74.6, 46.1, 74.1, and 9.16 A mu U/ml in men, respectively. Conclusions HOMA-IR, HOMA-B (except for HOMA2-B in women), HOMA-S, and fasting insulin were independent predictors of T2DM. Optimal cut-off points of HOMA-IR, HOMA-B, HOMA-S, and fasting serum insulin were determined from a population-based study for identifying incident T2DM.
引用
收藏
页码:905 / 915
页数:11
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]
Evaluation of fasting plasma insulin concentration as an estimate of insulin action in nondiabetic individuals: comparison with the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) [J].
Abbasi, Fahim ;
Okeke, QueenDenise ;
Reaven, Gerald M. .
ACTA DIABETOLOGICA, 2014, 51 (02) :193-197
[2]
COMPENDIUM OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITIES - CLASSIFICATION OF ENERGY COSTS OF HUMAN PHYSICAL ACTIVITIES [J].
AINSWORTH, BE ;
HASKELL, WL ;
LEON, AS ;
JACOBS, DR ;
MONTOYE, HJ ;
SALLIS, JF ;
PAFFENBARGER, RS .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1993, 25 (01) :71-80
[3]
Metabolically healthy obesity and risk of incident type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies [J].
Bell, J. A. ;
Kivimaki, M. ;
Hamer, M. .
OBESITY REVIEWS, 2014, 15 (06) :504-515
[4]
Selection of the appropriate method for the assessment of insulin resistance [J].
Borai, Anwar ;
Livingstone, Callum ;
Kaddam, Ibrahim ;
Ferns, Gordon .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2011, 11
[5]
Do we know what homeostasis model assessment measures? If not, does it matter? [J].
Boyko, Edward J. ;
Jensen, Christine Chen .
DIABETES CARE, 2007, 30 (10) :2725-2728
[6]
Fasting glucose cutoff point: where does the risk terminate? Tehran lipid and glucose study [J].
Bozorgmanesh, Mohammadreza ;
Hadaegh, Farzad ;
Saadat, Navid ;
Azizi, Fereidoun .
ACTA DIABETOLOGICA, 2012, 49 (05) :341-348
[7]
New insights on the simultaneous assessment of insulin sensitivity and β-cell function with the HOMA2 method [J].
Caumo, Andrea ;
Perseghin, Gianluca ;
Brunani, Amelia ;
Luzi, Livio .
DIABETES CARE, 2006, 29 (12) :2733-2734
[8]
Committee IPAQR, 2005, GUID DAT PROC AN INT
[9]
Relationship of hyperinsulinaemia, insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction with incident diabetes and pre-diabetes: the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study [J].
Derakhshan, A. ;
Tohidi, M. ;
Arshi, B. ;
Khalili, D. ;
Azizi, F. ;
Hadaegh, F. .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2015, 32 (01) :24-32
[10]
Sex Specific Incidence Rates of Type 2 Diabetes and Its Risk Factors over 9 Years of Follow-Up: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study [J].
Derakhshan, Arash ;
Sardarinia, Mahsa ;
Khalili, Davood ;
Momenan, Amir Abbas ;
Azizi, Fereidoun ;
Hadaegh, Farzad .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (07)