Cognitive subtractions may not add up: The interaction between semantic processing and response mode

被引:70
作者
Jennings, JM [1 ]
McIntosh, AR [1 ]
Kapur, S [1 ]
Tulving, E [1 ]
Houle, S [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV TORONTO, CLARKE INST PSYCHIAT, PET CTR, TORONTO, ON M5S 1A1, CANADA
关键词
D O I
10.1006/nimg.1997.0257
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Determining the areas of brain activity associated with cognitive processing has typically relied on the use of a subtraction paradigm, which is based on the premise that the neural processes underlying behavior are additive. If the additivity assumption is valid then brain regions associated with a semantic processing task should be the same regardless of how participants make a response. To investigate this proposition, participants underwent six PET scans, in which they made semantic or letter word judgments, responding ''yes'' or ''no'' in three different modes: mouse-clicking, spoken response, or silent thought. Analyses showed an increase in regional cerebral blood flow associated with semantic processing in the left inferior frontal cortex, anterior cingulate, and right cerebellum for all three response conditions. However, there was a significant interaction: the greatest increase was observed in the mouse-click condition and the weakest change seen with silent thought. Moreover, other areas of the brain were uniquely activated for each response mode. The results indicate that different areas of the brain were recruited for semantic processing depending on how participants had to organize their responses. Implications for the additivity assumption and methods of analysis to be used in conjunction with the subtraction technique are discussed. (C) 1997 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 239
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Regional cerebral blood flow during object naming and word reading [J].
Bookheimer, SY ;
Zeffiro, IA ;
Blaxton, T ;
Gaillard, W ;
Theodore, W .
HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 1995, 3 (02) :93-106
[2]  
Bookstein F.L., 1991, Morphometric tools for landmark data
[3]   SPATIAL AND VERBAL COMPONENTS OF ACT OF RECALL [J].
BROOKS, LR .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1968, 22 (05) :349-&
[4]  
CABEZA R, 1997, IN PRESS J COGNIT NE
[5]   LEVELS OF PROCESSING - FRAMEWORK FOR MEMORY RESEARCH [J].
CRAIK, FIM ;
LOCKHART, RS .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1972, 11 (06) :671-684
[6]  
Demonet J. F., 1993, Human Brain Mapping, V1, P39, DOI 10.1002/hbm.460010105
[7]  
EDGINGTON ES, 1980, RANDOMIZATION TESTS
[8]   Distributed Hierarchical Processing in the Primate Cerebral Cortex [J].
Felleman, Daniel J. ;
Van Essen, David C. .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 1991, 1 (01) :1-47
[9]   Is multivariate analysis of PET data more revealing than the univariate approach? Evidence from a study of episodic memory retrieval [J].
Fletcher, PC ;
Dolan, RJ ;
Shallice, T ;
Frith, CD ;
Frackowiak, RSJ ;
Friston, KJ .
NEUROIMAGE, 1996, 3 (03) :209-215
[10]  
Friston Holmes, 1994, Human Brain Mapping, V2, P189, DOI [10.1002/hbm.460020402, DOI 10.1002/HBM.460020402]