A unified approach to form error evaluation

被引:83
作者
Weber, T
Motavalli, S
Fallahi, B [1 ]
Cheraghi, SH
机构
[1] No Illinois Univ, Dept Mech Engn, De Kalb, IL 60115 USA
[2] Wichita State Univ, Dept Ind & Mfg Engn, Wichita, KS USA
[3] Calif State Univ Hayward, Dept Engn, Hayward, CA 94542 USA
[4] No Illinois Univ, Dept Ind Engn, De Kalb, IL 60115 USA
来源
PRECISION ENGINEERING-JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETIES FOR PRECISION ENGINEERING AND NANOTECHNOLOGY | 2002年 / 26卷 / 03期
关键词
error evaluation; tolerance specifications; functional equivalence;
D O I
10.1016/S0141-6359(02)00105-8
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Evaluation of form error is a critical aspect of many manufacturing processes. Machines such as the coordinate measuring machine (CMM) often employ the technique of the least squares form fitting algorithms. While based on sound mathematical principles, it is well known that the method of least squares often overestimates the tolerance zone, causing good parts to be rejected. Many methods have been proposed in efforts to improve upon results obtained via least squares, including those, which result in the minimum zone tolerance value. However, these methods are mathematically complex and often computationally slow for cases where a large number of data points are to be evaluated. Extensive amount of data is generated where measurement equipment such as laser scanners are used for inspection, as well as in reverse engineering applications. In this report, a unified linear approximation technique is introduced for use in evaluating the forms of straightness, flatness, circularity, and cylindricity. Non-linear equation for each form is linearized using Taylor expansion, then solved as a linear program using software written in C++ language. Examples are taken from the literature as well as from data collected on a coordinate measuring machine for comparison with least squares and minimum zone results. For all examples, the new formulations are found to equal or better than the least squares results and provide a good approximation to the minimum zone tolerance. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 278
页数:10
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] *AM NAT STAND I, 1982, Y145M1982 ANSI ASME
  • [2] American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1994, Y145M ASME
  • [3] ANAND S, P 6 IND ENG RES C I
  • [4] VERIFICATION OF FORM TOLERANCES .1. BASIC ISSUES, FLATNESS, AND STRAIGHTNESS
    CARR, K
    FERREIRA, P
    [J]. PRECISION ENGINEERING-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR PRECISION ENGINEERING, 1995, 17 (02): : 131 - 143
  • [5] CARR K, 1995, PRECIS ENG, V17, P143
  • [6] Straightness and flatness tolerance evaluation: An optimization approach
    Cheraghi, SH
    Lim, HS
    Motavalli, S
    [J]. PRECISION ENGINEERING-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR PRECISION ENGINEERING, 1996, 18 (01): : 30 - 37
  • [7] CHERAGHI SH, 1996, P 2 SM WU S MAN SCI, P212
  • [8] FORBES AB, 1989, 14089 NPL
  • [9] An exact solution for the roundness evaluation problems
    Huang, JP
    [J]. PRECISION ENGINEERING-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR PRECISION ENGINEERING, 1999, 23 (01): : 2 - 8
  • [10] LIN SS, 1995, MANUFACTURING REV, V8, P47