Valve-sparing aortic root reconstruction in patients with significant aortic insufficiency

被引:45
作者
Kallenbach, K [1 ]
Karck, M [1 ]
Leyh, RG [1 ]
Hagl, C [1 ]
Walles, T [1 ]
Harringer, W [1 ]
Haverich, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0003-4975(02)04143-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. To assess the feasibility and outcome of the valve-sparing aortic root reimplantation technique in patients with severe preoperative aortic insufficiency (AI). Methods. Within 8 years we have operated on 158 patients with aneurysms of the ascending aorta using the reimplantation technique. We identified 83 patients with AI grade 3 or 4 (mean 3.1 +/- 0.4) preoperatively (study group). This cohort was compared with 71 patients with AI grade 2 or less (mean 1.3 +/- 0.9; control group) with regard to mortality, operative variables, complications, need for reoperation, postoperative AI, and clinical presentation during follow-up. Results. Patient demographics were comparable in both groups. However, Marfan's syndrome (32% versus 13%, P = 0.006) and acute type A aortic dissection (20% versus 8.4%, p = 0.059) were more frequent in the control group. In addition, bypass (177 +/- 60 minutes versus 160 +/- 36 minutes, p = 0.022) and cross clamp times (133 34 minutes versus 124 +/- 27 minutes, p = 0.049) were significantly longer in controls. Mortality was low in the study group and comparable with controls (30-day, 3.6% versus 4.2%; during follow-up, 3.8% versus 5.9%; p = not significant [NS]). Reoperation rate was almost identical in both groups (3.8% versus 4.4%, p = NS). Mean grade of AI was significantly higher in the study group early postoperatively (0.31 +/- 0.46 versus 0.18 +/- 0.42, p = 0.049) but comparable at the last visit (0.43 +/- 0.58 versus 0.42 +/- 0.62, P = NS). During follow-up neither thromboembolic complications nor bleeding events were noted in either group. Clinical performance at the last visit revealed no significant difference between the groups. Conclusions. Preoperative severe aortic insufficiency does not impair the excellent outcome seen after a mean of 3 years of follow-up in patients undergoing the reimplantation technique for valve-sparing aortic root reconstruction. (C) 2002 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:S1765 / S1768
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Birks EJ, 1999, CIRCULATION, V100, P29
  • [2] BIRKS EJ, 1999, CIRCULATON S, V2, P35
  • [3] Results of aortic valve-sparing operations
    David, TE
    Armstrong, S
    Ivanov, J
    Feindel, CM
    Omran, A
    Webb, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2001, 122 (01) : 39 - 46
  • [4] REPAIR OF THE AORTIC-VALVE IN PATIENTS WITH AORTIC-INSUFFICIENCY AND AORTIC ROOT ANEURYSM
    DAVID, TE
    FEINDEL, CM
    BOS, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1995, 109 (02) : 345 - 352
  • [5] DAVID TE, 1992, J THORAC CARDIOV SUR, V103, P617
  • [6] Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations
    Edmunds, LH
    Clark, RE
    Cohn, LH
    Grunkemeier, GL
    Miller, C
    Weisel, RD
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1996, 62 (03) : 932 - 935
  • [7] FLEISCHER KJ, 1997, ANN THORAC SURG
  • [8] Harringer W, 1999, CIRCULATION, V100, P24
  • [9] Valve sparing aortic root reconstruction versus composite replacement - perioperative course and early complications
    Kallenbach, K
    Pethig, K
    Schwarz, M
    Milz, A
    Haverich, A
    Harringer, W
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2001, 20 (01) : 77 - 81
  • [10] KALLENBACH K, IN PRESS ANN THORAC