Entrepreneurs and the ordering of institutional reform -: Poland, Slovakia, Romania, Russia and Ukraine compared

被引:79
作者
Johnson, S
McMillan, J
Woodruff, C
机构
[1] MIT, Sloan Sch Management, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Grad Sch Business, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] UCSD, Grad Sch Int Relat & Pacific Studies, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
关键词
entrepreneurs; institutional reform; property rights; external finance;
D O I
10.1111/1468-0351.00034
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We use survey data to examine new firms in Poland, Slovakia, Romania, Russia and Ukraine. By measures of job growth, security of property, and market development, our countries fall into two groups: an advanced group including Poland, Romania and Slovakia, with Slovakia falling somewhat behind the other two; and a backward group of Russia and Ukraine. Macroeconomic stability is not sufficient for private-sector growth. A lack of bank finance does not seem to prevent private-sector growth. More inhibiting than inadequate finance are insecure property rights.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 36
页数:36
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1997, BROOKINGS PAPERS EC
  • [2] ASLUND A, 1996, BROOKINGS PAPERS EC
  • [3] Disorganization
    Blanchard, O
    Kremer, M
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1997, 112 (04) : 1091 - 1126
  • [4] Blanchard O., 1997, EC POSTCOMMUNIST TRA
  • [5] Brezinski H., 1996, EC IMPACT NEW FIRMS
  • [6] CITRIN DA, 1995, POLICY EXPERIENCES I
  • [7] Dewatripont M, 1995, AM ECON REV, V85, P1207
  • [8] EBRD, 1996, Transition Report 1996: Infrastructure and Savings
  • [9] EBRD (European Bank for Reconstruction and Development), 1997, Transition Report 1997
  • [10] FRYDMAN R, 1991, REFORMING CENTRAL E