Horizontal space misrepresentation in unilateral brain damage I. Visual and proprioceptive-motor influences in left unilateral neglect

Patients with unilateral neglect can misperceive horizontal distances in the contralesional space as being shorter than equivalent ipsilesional ones. We evaluated the visual and motor-proprioceptive components of space misrepresentation through a distance reproduction task performed both with and without visual guidance. Four groups of right brain damaged patients (neglect with hemianopia (N+H+). neglect with inferior quandrantanopia (N+Q+), neglect without hemianopia (N+H-) and patients without neglect or hemianopia (N-H-)) and one group of healthy controls (C) performed the line bisection task and reproduced horizontal distances either by setting the endpoints or by doubling the length of a line in the contralesional or ipsilesional space. The doubling length task was administered in three different conditions: (a) visuomotor (the patient draws the line in free vision) (b) visual (by sight the patient guides the examiner drawing the line); (c) proprioceptive-motor (the patient is blindfolded and manually inspects and extends the horizontal distance subtended by the line). Compared to C and N-H- patients, only N+H+ patients exhibited a significant ipsilesional shift in line bisection. N+H+ patients showed the most severe contralesional-overextension/ipsilesional-underextension asymmetry in the endpoint, visuomotor and visual line extension task. In the proprioceptive-motor condition no asymmetry was found and N+H- showed greater overextension on both sides of space. In N+H-, brain damage was mainly centered in central-frontal cortex and basal ganglia. These findings re-emphasize the relevance of damage to visual retinotopically organized representations of space in the genesis of horizontal space misrepresentation of neglect patients and suggest the possible association of a non-lateralized defective processing of proprioceptive-motor information with unilateral neglect. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.