Phase III development of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire module for women undergoing breast reconstruction

被引:28
作者
Winters, Z. E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Balta, V. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Thomson, H. J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Brandberg, Y. [4 ]
Oberguggenberger, A. [6 ]
Sinove, Y. [7 ]
Unukovych, D. [4 ]
Nava, M. [8 ]
Sandelin, K. [5 ]
Johansson, H. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Sch Clin Sci, Bristol BS10 5NB, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Sch Clin Sci, Breast Reconstruct Patient Reported & Clin Outcom, Bristol BS10 5NB, Avon, England
[3] North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hosp, Bristol BS10 5NB, Avon, England
[4] Karolinska Inst, Dept Pathol & Oncol, Stockholm, Sweden
[5] Karolinska Inst, Dept Mol Med & Surg, Stockholm, Sweden
[6] Med Univ Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[7] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Ghent, Belgium
[8] Univ Milan, Inst Tumori Milano, Milan, Italy
关键词
PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES; BODY-IMAGE; IMMEDIATE; SURGERY; VALIDATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1002/bjs.9397
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
100210 [外科学];
摘要
BackgroundComprehensive outcome assessments after breast reconstruction (BRR) require surgery-specific patient-reported outcome measures. The aims of this study were to assess the relevance, acceptability and redundancy of questions/items (phase III pretesting) of a new BRR questionnaire evaluating patients' health-related quality of life before and after BRR. Phase III occurred in collaboration with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) following earlier development phases that identified 31 items. MethodsThe EORTC BRR subgroup applied decision-making rules to each question according to eight EORTC criteria. A total of 197 patients (from the UK, Austria, Belgium, Italy and Sweden) were recruited. Forty-seven patients completed pre- and post-BRR questionnaires prospectively, and 150 reported post-BRR questionnaires only retrospectively. Qualitative debriefing interviews were undertaken in 189 patients. Preliminary psychometric analyses were performed. ResultsThirty-one items fulfilled relevance', with none producing difficulties'. Ten items were not a priority for 10 per cent of respondents. Of these, two questions concerning muscle twitching in the affected breast and problem with donor-site swelling were deleted. Three redundant items were deleted: weakness in arm, which correlated significantly to the Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) BR23 breast questionnaire, and shape and colour of the affected nipple. Descriptive statistics reduced the module to 26 items conceptualized into three provisional scales (disease treatment/surgery-related symptoms, sexuality and cosmetic outcome) within the newly completed questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-BRR26. ConclusionThe QLQ-BRR26 is available for psychometric validation in a large-field international sample. The intended use for QLQ-BRR26 is alongside EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23, in women treated by mastectomy for breast cancer and undergoing all types of BRR. A valuable tool for patient-reported outcome measures in breast reconstruction
引用
收藏
页码:371 / 382
页数:12
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]
Altman G., 2000, STAT CONFIDENCE CONF
[2]
[Anonymous], GUID DEV QUEST MOD
[3]
The BREAST-Q: Further Validation in Independent Clinical Samples [J].
Cano, Stefan J. ;
Klassen, Anne F. ;
Scott, Amie M. ;
Cordeiro, Peter G. ;
Pusic, Andrea L. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 129 (02) :293-302
[4]
The Science behind Quality-of-Life Measurement: A Primer for Plastic Surgeons [J].
Cano, Stefan J. ;
Klassen, Anne ;
Pusic, Andrea L. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2009, 123 (03) :98E-106E
[5]
Measuring Quality of Life in Oncologic Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures [J].
Chen, Constance M. ;
Cano, Stefan J. ;
Klassen, Anne F. ;
King, Tari ;
McCarthy, Colleen ;
Cordeiro, Peter G. ;
Morrow, Monica ;
Pusic, Andrea L. .
BREAST JOURNAL, 2010, 16 (06) :587-597
[6]
The Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications Five-Year Experience [J].
Clavien, Pierre A. ;
Barkun, Jeffrey ;
de Oliveira, Michelle L. ;
Vauthey, Jean Nicolas ;
Dindo, Daniel ;
Schulick, Richard D. ;
de Santibanes, Eduardo ;
Pekolj, Juan ;
Slankamenac, Ksenija ;
Bassi, Claudio ;
Graf, Rolf ;
Vonlanthen, Rene ;
Padbury, Robert ;
Cameron, John L. ;
Makuuchi, Masatoshi .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2009, 250 (02) :187-196
[7]
Clinical Effectiveness Unit Royal College of Surgeons of England, NAT MAST BREAST REC
[8]
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, VSecond
[9]
Breast reconstruction after surgery for breast cancer [J].
Cordeiro, Peter G. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2008, 359 (15) :1590-1601
[10]
The validation of a quality of life scale to assess the impact of arm morbidity in breast cancer patients post-operatively [J].
Coster, S ;
Poole, K ;
Fallowfield, LJ .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2001, 68 (03) :273-282