Differences between participants and nonparticipants in an exercise trial for adults with rheumatoid arthritis

被引:38
作者
De Jong, Z
Munneke, M
Jansen, LM
Ronday, K
van Schaardenburg, DJ
Brand, R
van den Ende, CHM
Vlieland, TPMV
Zuijderduin, WM
Hazes, JMW
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Ctr Med, Dept Rheumatol, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Jan Van Breemen Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Leyenburg Hosp, The Hague, Netherlands
[4] Nethrlands Inst Hlth Serv Res, Nivel, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Rotterdam Univ, Med Ctr, Rotterdam, Netherlands
来源
ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH | 2004年 / 51卷 / 04期
关键词
arthritis; rheumatoid; exercise; patient's participation; generalizability;
D O I
10.1002/art.20531
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective. To investigate the generalizability of the results of a randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of long-term, high-intensity exercises in the rheumatoid arthritis patients in training (RAPIT) trial by comparing the characteristics of the participants with the nonparticipants. Methods. Participants and nonparticipants were mailed questionnaires on sociodemographic characteristics, health status, reasons not to participate, and attitudes toward intensive exercise. Results. The questionnaires from 892 (75%) nonparticipants and 299 (97%) participants were collected. The nonparticipants were slightly older, more often male, and had longer disease duration than the participants. The nonparticipants perceived their disease as more serious, used fewer disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, had a lower level of education, and a more negative attitude toward intensive exercise. Conclusion. The results of the RAPIT trial might not be generalizable to the entire target population. To promote participation in long-term, high-intensity exercises, health professionals should more actively discuss the potential benefits of exercise with their RA patients while taking into consideration specific factors related to participation.
引用
收藏
页码:593 / 600
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, FDN CLIN RES
[2]  
ARNETT FC, 1987, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V31, P315
[3]  
BERG JW, 1977, CANCER, V39, P467, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197702)39:2<467::AID-CNCR2820390215>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-B
[5]   DIFFERENCES BETWEEN RESPONDENTS AND NONRESPONDENTS IN A POPULATION-BASED CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE STUDY [J].
CRIQUI, MH ;
BARRETTCONNOR, E ;
AUSTIN, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1978, 108 (05) :367-372
[6]   Is a long-term high-intensity safe in patients with exercise program effective and rheumatoid arthritis? Results of a randomized controlled trial [J].
de Jong, Z ;
Munneke, M ;
Zwinderman, AH ;
Kroon, HM ;
Jansen, A ;
Ronday, KH ;
van Schaardenburg, D ;
Dijkmans, BAC ;
Van den Ende, CHM ;
Breedveld, FC ;
Vlieland, TPMV ;
Hazes, JMW .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2003, 48 (09) :2415-2424
[7]  
DeJong Z, 1997, BRIT J RHEUMATOL, V36, P878
[8]   FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH ENROLLMENT IN AN EMPLOYEE FITNESS CENTER [J].
EAKIN, JM ;
GOTAY, CC ;
RADEMAKER, AW ;
COWELL, JWF .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 1988, 30 (08) :633-637
[9]  
EKBLOM B, 1975, SCAND J RHEUMATOL, V4, P87, DOI 10.3109/03009747509095620
[10]   DYNAMIC VERSUS STATIC TRAINING IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS [J].
EKDAHL, C ;
ANDERSSON, SI ;
MORITZ, U ;
SVENSSON, B .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 1990, 19 (01) :17-26