A posteriori registration and subtraction of panoramic compared with intraoral radiography

被引：6

作者：

Deserno, Thomas M. ^{[1
]}

Rangarajan, Janaki Raman ^{[1
]}

Hoffmann, Jens ^{[1
]}

Braegger, Urs ^{[2
]}

Mericske-Stern, Regina ^{[3
]}

Enkling, Norbert ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Dept Med Informat, Aachen, Germany

[2] Univ Bern, Sch Dent Med, Dept Periodontol & Fixed Prosthodont, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland

[3] Univ Bern, Sch Dent Med, Dept Prosthodont, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland

来源：

ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY | 2009年 / 108卷 / 02期

关键词：

DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; IMAGE REGISTRATION; MANDIBULAR CONDYLE; STABILITY;

D O I：

10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.03.036

中图分类号：

R78 [口腔科学];

学科分类号：

100302 [口腔临床医学];

摘要：

Objectives. To demonstrate the feasibility of panoramic image subtraction for implant assessment. Study design. Three titanium implants were inserted into a fresh pig mandible. One intraoral and 2 panoramic images were obtained at baseline and after each of 6 incremental (0.3, 0.6, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 mm) removals of bone. For each incremental removal of bone, the mandible was removed from and replaced in the holding device. Images representing incremental bone removals were registered by computer with the baseline images and subtracted. Assessment of the subtraction images was based on visual inspection and analysis of structured noise. Results. Incremental bone removals were more visible in intraoral than in panoramic subtraction images; however, computer-based registration of panoramic images reduced the structured noise and enhanced the visibility of incremental removals. Conclusion. The feasibility of panoramic image subtraction for implant assessment was demonstrated. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 108:e39-e45)

引用

页码：E39 / E45

页数：7

共 23 条

[1]

Araki K, 1992, Dentomaxillofac Radiol, V21, P88

[2]

Bae KH, 2008, INT J PERIODONT REST, V28, P137

[3]

Comparison of hard tissue density changes around implants assessed in digitized conventional radiographs and subtraction images [J].

Bittar-Cortez, Juliana Araujo ;

Passeri, Luis Augusto ;

Boscolo, Frab Norberto ;

Haiter-Neto, Francisco .

CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2006, 17 (05) :560-564

[4]

An evaluation of digital subtraction radiography for assessment of changes in position of the mandibular condyle [J].

Ekberg, EC ;

Petersson, A ;

Nilner, M .

DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 1998, 27 (04) :230-235

[5]

Garg A K, 1995, Implant Soc, V5, P7

[6]

A DIGITAL SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE FOR DENTAL RADIOGRAPHY [J].

GRONDAHL, HG ;

GRONDAHL, K ;

WEBBER, RL .

ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 1983, 55 (01) :96-102

[7]

Algorithms for radiological image registration and their clinical application [J].

Hawkes, DJ .

JOURNAL OF ANATOMY, 1998, 193 :347-361

[8]

Ibanez L., 2005, ITK SOFTWARE GUIDE I

[9]

Kuroyanagi K, 1990, Dent Jpn (Tokyo), V27, P115

[10]

A comparison of similarity measures for digital subtraction radiography [J].

Lehmann, T ;

Sovakar, A ;

Schmitt, W ;

Repges, R .

COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 1997, 27 (02) :151-167

← 1 2 3 →