Cross-border transport and spatial variability of suspended particles in Mexicali and California's Imperial Valley

被引:48
作者
Chow, JC
Watson, JG
Green, MC
Lowenthal, DH
Bates, B
Oslund, W
Torres, G
机构
[1] Desert Res Inst, Reno, NV 89512 USA
[2] US EPA, Richmond, CA 94804 USA
[3] Calif Air Resources Board, Sacramento, CA 95812 USA
[4] Solam Co, Calexico, CA 92231 USA
关键词
cross-border transport; PM10; CMB source apportionment;
D O I
10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00282-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The city of Mexicali, the state capitol of Baja California, Mexico, lies 189 kilometers (km) inland from the Pacific Coast on the California border at the lower end of California's Imperial Valley. Mexicali is adjacent to the California city of Calexico and 20 km south of the Imperial county seat of El Centro. The Mexicali and Calexico PM10 monitors were separated by only 10 km; yet, three measurements at Calexico exceeded 150 mu g m(-3), while 23 samples exceeded this PM10 standard at the Mexicali site. Air how through Mexicali is channeled by the Imperial Valley and is usually from the northwest or southeast, with northwesterlies being most frequent. During the study period from March 1992 through August 1993, hourly PM10 concentrations were higher in the border area during southerly than northerly flow. For wind flow patterns in both directions, PM10 initially decreased with wind speed due to improved ventilation, then increased at high wind speeds due to increased suspension of soil particles. Average cross-border transport of PM10 was three times higher for southerly flow from Mexico than for northerly flow from the United States into Mexico. Because northerly winds were more frequent, the time-integrated cross-border transport over the study period was only about one-and-one-half times higher from Mexico. PM10 mass concentrations at the Mexicali site were highest when flow was over the main Calexico-Mexicali urban area (northwesterly flow) but were lower when flow was from less urbanized desert areas (southeasterly flow). Although Mexicali's PM10 concentrations were almost double those measured at Calexico, annual average relative source contributions were similar, with 70% from fugitive dust, 10-15% from motor vehicle exhaust, 4-8% from vegetative burning or cooking, 2-3% from marine aerosol (Gulf of California), 1.5-3% from secondary ammonium sulfate, and 1.5% to 2.5% from secondary ammonium nitrate. Primary industrial source contributions were negligible. (C) 2000 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1833 / 1843
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   TEMPORAL VARIATIONS IN ELEMENTAL CONCENTRATIONS OF ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOLS IN MEXICO-CITY [J].
ALDAPE, F ;
FLORES, J ;
DIAZ, RV ;
CRUMPTON, D .
NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION B-BEAM INTERACTIONS WITH MATERIALS AND ATOMS, 1993, 75 (1-4) :304-307
[2]  
ALDAPE F, 1991, INT J PIXE, V1, P373, DOI DOI 10.1142/S0129083591000251
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, CMB8 APPL VALIDATION
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1997, CHEM MASS BALANCE RE
[5]  
BARDFOOT KM, 1984, ATMOS ENVIRON, V18, P467
[6]   EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS OF MEXICO-CITY VEHICLES [J].
BEATON, SP ;
BISHOP, GA ;
STEDMAN, DH .
JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 1992, 42 (11) :1424-1429
[7]   INFRARED SPECTROSCOPIC VIEW OF ATMOSPHERIC PARTICULATES OVER EL PASO, TEXAS [J].
BLANCO, AJ ;
MCINTYRE, RG .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1972, 6 (08) :557-&
[8]   Assessment of particulate concentrations from domestic biomass combustion in rural Mexico [J].
Brauer, M ;
Bartlett, K ;
RegaladoPineda, J ;
PerezPadilla, R .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 30 (01) :104-109
[9]   Comparative aerosol studies of Pacific Rim cities - Santiago, Chile (1987); Mexico City, Mexico (1987-1990); and Los Angeles, USA (1973 and 1987) [J].
Cahill, TA ;
Morales, R ;
Miranda, J .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1996, 30 (05) :747-749
[10]  
Chow J., 1999, ELEMENTAL ANAL AIRBO, P97