Risk-based environmental decision-making using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP)

被引:165
作者
Tesfamariam, Solomon [1 ]
Sadiq, Rehan [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Council Canada, Inst Res Construct, Ottawa, ON K1A 0R6, Canada
关键词
analytic hierarchy process (AHP); fuzzy arithmetic; multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM); risk attitude; drilling fluids;
D O I
10.1007/s00477-006-0042-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Environmental risk management is an integral part of risk analyses. The selection of different mitigating or preventive alternatives often involve competing and conflicting criteria, which requires sophisticated multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is one of the most commonly used MCDM methods, which integrates subjective and personal preferences in performing analyses. AHP works on a premise that decision-making of complex problems can be handled by structuring the complex problem into a simple and comprehensible hierarchical structure. However, AHP involves human subjectivity, which introduces vagueness type uncertainty and necessitates the use of decision-making under uncertainty. In this paper, vagueness type uncertainty is considered using fuzzy-based techniques. The traditional AHP is modified to fuzzy AHP using fuzzy arithmetic operations. The concept of risk attitude and associated confidence of a decision maker on the estimates of pairwise comparisons are also discussed. The methodology of the proposed technique is built on a hypothetical example and its efficacy is demonstrated through an application dealing with the selection of drilling fluid/mud for offshore oil and gas operations.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 50
页数:16
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   APPLICATION OF DEMPSTER-SHAFER THEORY FOR INTERPRETATION OF SEISMIC PARAMETERS [J].
ALIM, S .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1988, 114 (09) :2070-2084
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Theory and Applications of Analytic Network Process
[3]   A rational reasoning method from fuzzy perceptions in route choice [J].
Arslan, T ;
Khisty, CJ .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2005, 150 (03) :419-435
[4]  
Asante-Duah D.K., 1993, HAZARDOUS WASTE RISK, P384
[5]   MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS WITH FUZZY PAIRWISE COMPARISONS [J].
BOENDER, CGE ;
DEGRAAN, JG ;
LOOTSMA, FA .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1989, 29 (02) :133-143
[6]   FUZZY HIERARCHICAL ANALYSIS [J].
BUCKLEY, JJ .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1985, 17 (03) :233-247
[7]   Fuzzy multiple criteria decision making: Recent developments [J].
Carlsson, C ;
Fuller, R .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1996, 78 (02) :139-153
[8]   Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP [J].
Chang, DY .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1996, 95 (03) :649-655
[9]   RANKING FUZZY NUMBERS WITH MAXIMIZING SET AND MINIMIZING SET [J].
CHEN, SH .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1985, 17 (02) :113-129
[10]   Evaluating weapon systems using ranking fuzzy numbers [J].
Cheng, CH .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1999, 107 (01) :25-35