Measurement of lung tumor volumes using three-dimensional computer planning software

被引:73
作者
Bowden, P
Fisher, R
Mac Manus, M
Wirth, A
Duchesne, G
Millward, M
McKenzie, A
Andrews, J
Ball, D
机构
[1] Peter MacCallum Canc Inst, Div Radiat Oncol, Melbourne, Vic 8006, Australia
[2] Peter MacCallum Canc Inst, Ctr Stat, Melbourne, Vic 8006, Australia
[3] Peter MacCallum Canc Inst, Div Haematol & Med Oncol, Melbourne, Vic 8006, Australia
[4] Peter MacCallum Canc Inst, Dept Diagnost Imaging, Melbourne, Vic 8006, Australia
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2002年 / 53卷 / 03期
关键词
non-small-cell lung cancer; tumor volume; three-dimensional treatment planning;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(02)02783-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To examine the interclinician variation in the definition of gross tumor volume (GTV) in patients undergoing radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), develop methods to minimize this variation, and test these methods. Methods and Materials: The radiotherapy planning computed tomography (CT) scans of 6 consecutive patients with NSCLC in which the radiologist was able to define and outline the GTV were used. Six oncologists independently contoured the tumors with the radiologist's markings as a guide using a three-dimensional treatment planning system. Separate contours were prepared using only mediastinal window settings and using both mediastinal and lung window settings. The volumes were calculated using the planning system software (series 1). Factors that resulted in interclinician variation were determined, and, after a 3-year interval, 5 of the 6 clinicians redefined the GTVs using a revised protocol aimed at minimizing variation (series 2). Results: For series 1, the interclinician variation in the measurement of volumes ranged from 5%, in the most tightly measured tumor, to 42%, in the most variable, but was, on average, 20%. Statistically significant differences were noted among the clinicians (p = 0.002), that is, some clinicians tended to record relatively small and some relatively large volumes. The reasons for the variation among the oncologists included a tendency to include regions with a low probability of containing tumor, as if the oncologist were contouring a target volume; inclusion of adjacent atelectasis (ignoring the radiologist's outline); and variable treatment of spicules. When the exercise was repeated using the revised protocol (series 2), the degree of interclinician variation was reduced, with a range of 7-22% (average 13%). In series 2, the differences among the clinicians were not statistically significant (p = 0.25). Conclusion: Despite major radiologic input, significant variation occurred in the delineation of the three-dimensional GTVs of NSCLC among oncologists. Standardization of the approach with guidelines resulted in a reduction in this variation. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:566 / 573
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Bland M, 1995, INTRO MED STAT
[2]   Gross tumor volume, critical prognostic factor in patients treated with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for non-small-cell lung carcinoma [J].
Bradley, JD ;
Ieumwananonthachai, N ;
Purdy, JA ;
Wasserman, TH ;
Lockett, MA ;
Graham, MV ;
Perez, CA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 52 (01) :49-57
[3]   Interphysician variability in defining the planning target volume in the irradiation of prostate and seminal vesicles [J].
Cazzaniga, LF ;
Marinoni, MA ;
Bossi, A ;
Bianchi, E ;
Cagna, E ;
Cosentino, D ;
Scandolaro, L ;
Valli, M ;
Frigerio, M .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1998, 47 (03) :293-296
[4]  
Cole TJ, 2000, STAT MED, V19, P3109, DOI 10.1002/1097-0258(20001130)19:22<3109::AID-SIM558>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-F
[6]  
DENHAM JW, 1993, LUNG CANCER, V8, P275
[7]   Tumor volume: a basic and specific response predictor in radiotherapy [J].
Dubben, HH ;
Thames, HD ;
Beck-Bornholdt, HP .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1998, 47 (02) :167-174
[8]   THE EFFECT ON APPARENT SIZE OF SIMULATED PULMONARY NODULES OF USING 3 STANDARD CT WINDOW SETTINGS [J].
HARRIS, KM ;
ADAMS, H ;
LLOYD, DCF ;
HARVEY, DJ .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1993, 47 (04) :241-244
[9]  
*INT COMM RAD UN M, 1993, 50 INT COMM RAD UN M
[10]   Clinical variability of target volume description in conformal radiotherapy planning [J].
Logue, JP ;
Sharrock, CL ;
Cowan, RA ;
Read, G ;
Marrs, J ;
Mott, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 41 (04) :929-932