Primary Closure Versus T-tube Drainage After Open Choledochotomy

被引:105
作者
Ambreen, M. [1 ]
Shaikh, A. R. [1 ]
Jamal, A. [1 ]
Quireshi, J. N. [1 ]
Dalwani, A. G. [1 ]
Memon, M. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Liaquat Univ Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Surg, Jamshoro, Sindh, Pakistan
关键词
choledocholithiasis; open choledochotomy; primary closure; COMMON BILE-DUCT; BILIARY DRAINAGE; EXPLORATION; MANAGEMENT; STONES; CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS;
D O I
10.1016/S1015-9584(09)60004-X
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
100210 [外科学];
摘要
BACKGROUND: Choledochotomy followed by T-tube has long been a standard surgical treatment for choledocholithiasis. It is still a preferred choice in many hospitals where minimal invasive procedures are not feasible. The use of T-tube is nor without complications. To avoid the complications associated with T-tube, we have performed primary closure of the common bile duct (CBD) after exploration. This pilot study assesses the safety of primary closure of CBD, which would help form a basis for implementation on a wider scale. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical results of primary Closure with T-tube drainage after open choledochotomy and assess the safety of primary closure for future application on a greater mass. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This comparative Study was conducted at surgical unit IV Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro, from January 2007 to December 2007. Thirty-Five patients were included in the Study of which 16 patients underwent primary closure. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were included in the study. The mean age of patients who had primary closure done (n = 16) was 46.0 +/- 16.8 and there were two (12.5%) males and 14 (87.5%) females. After primary closure of the CBD, bile leakage was noted in one patient (6.3%), which subsided without any biliary peritonitis as compared to the T-tube group in which two patients (10.5%) had bile leakage. Postoperative jaundice was seen in one patient (5.3%) who had a T-tube because of a blockage of CBD. Not a single patient had a retained stone in both groups as well as no recurrence of CBD stones. The Postoperative hospital stay after primary closure was 5.56 +/- 1.1 days as compared to after T-tube drainage which was 13.6 +/- 2.3 days. The total cost of treatment in patients who underwent primary closure was USD 194.5 +/- 41.5 but after T-tube drainage it was USD548.6 +/- 88.5. The median follow up duration for both groups was 6 months. CONCLUSION: Primary CBD closure is a safe and cost effective alternative to routine T-tube drainage after open choledochotomy. [Asian J Surg 2009;32(1):21-5]
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 25
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]
Ahrendt S, 2004, SABISTON TXB SURG BI, V17th, P486
[2]
COMMON BILE-DUCT OBSTRUCTION FOLLOWING T-TUBE PLACEMENT AT LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY [J].
BERNSTEIN, DE ;
GOLDBERG, RI ;
UNGER, SW .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1994, 40 (03) :362-365
[3]
CHEN SS, 1990, ACTA CHIR SCAND, V156, P387
[4]
Choledocholithiasis: Evolving standards for diagnosis and management [J].
Freitas, Marilee L. ;
Bell, Robert L. ;
Duffy, Andrew J. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 12 (20) :3162-3167
[5]
Gharaibeh KIA, 2000, INT SURG, V85, P57
[6]
Hotta T, 2003, HEPATO-GASTROENTEROL, V50, P315
[7]
Epidemiology and natural history of common bile duct stones and prediction of disease [J].
Ko, CW ;
Lee, SP .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 56 (06) :S165-S169
[8]
Towards T-tube free laparoscopic bile duct exploration - A methodologic evolution during 300 consecutive procedures [J].
Martin, IJ ;
Bailey, IS ;
Rhodes, M ;
O'Rourke, N ;
Nathanson, L ;
Fielding, G .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1998, 228 (01) :29-34
[9]
MEHMOOD A, 2005, WORLD J SURG, V29, P865
[10]
Ml Angel Mercado, 2006, ANN HEPATOL, V1, P44