The role of microlaparoscopy for safer wall entry: incidence of umbilical adhesions according to past surgical history

被引:15
作者
Audebert, AJM [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Greenblatt France, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
关键词
laparotomy; microlaparoscopy; umbilical adhesions;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2508.1999.00336.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To determine the incidence of umbilical adhesions related to previous surgical history. Design A prospective single-centre study with a single operator. Setting Clinique Saint-Sernin and Polyclinique de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France. Subjects 900 patients undergoing diagnostic or operative laparoscopy, classified into four groups: group I, 419 patients with no previous surgical surgery (control group); group II, 140 patients with previous major operative laparoscopy; group III 145 patients with previous laparotomy with a horizontal suprapubic incision; group IV, 96 patients with a previous laparotomy with a midline incision. Intervention Inspection of the umbilical area for the presence of adhesions, with a microlaparoscope passed through a Veress needle at Palmer's point. Main outcome measures Incidence and severity of umbilical adhesions and their potential risk in case of blind insertion of the umbilical trocar. Results Umbilical adhesions were noticed in 9.77% of the 900 patients. The incidence was different in the four groups: group I, 0.77%; group II, 1.42%; group III, 21.37%; group IV, 53.12%. Severe adhesions, with a potential risk in case of blind insertion of the umbilical trocar, were encountered in 0.38%, 0.71%, 6.89% and 31.25%, respectively, in the patients in the four groups. Conclusions Women with previous laparotomy have a higher incidence of umbilical adhesions, especially in the case of midline incisions. Preliminary inspection of the umbilical area with a microlaparoscope and insertion of the umbilical trocar under direct vision are recommended in these high risk patients, in order to reduce complications of trocar insertion.
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 367
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
BARISIC D, 1996, GYNAECOL ENDOSC, V5, P283
[2]   THE INCIDENCE OF ADHESIONS AFTER PRIOR LAPAROTOMY - A LAPAROSCOPIC APPRAISAL [J].
BRILL, AI ;
NEZHAT, F ;
NEZHAT, CH ;
NEZHAT, C .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 85 (02) :269-272
[3]  
Chang, 1994, J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc, V1, pS7, DOI 10.1016/S1074-3804(05)80888-6
[4]  
CHERNEY AH, 1998, CLIN PROBLEMS INJURI
[5]  
CHEVALIER L, 1993, REFERENCES GYNECOLOG, V1, P36
[6]  
COGNAT M, 1973, COELIOSCOPIE GYNECOL
[7]   DOUBLE LAPAROSCOPY - AN ALTERNATIVE 2-STAGE PROCEDURE TO MINIMIZE BOWEL AND BLOOD-VESSEL INJURY [J].
COHEN, MR ;
SCOCCIA, B .
JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY, 1991, 7 (04) :203-206
[8]  
CRIST DW, 1993, SURG CLIN N AM, V73, P265
[9]  
Gomel V, 1995, DIAGNOSTIC OPERATIVE
[10]  
KAALI SG, 1992, J REPROD MED, V37, P617