Three- vs four-drug antiretroviral regimens for the initial treatment of HIV-1 infection - A randomized controlled trial

被引:173
作者
Gulick, Roy M.
Ribaudo, Heather J.
Shikuma, Cecilia M.
Lalama, Christina
Schackman, Bruce R.
Meyer, William A., III
Acosta, Edward P.
Schouten, Jeffrey
Squires, Kathleen E.
Pilcher, Christopher D.
Murphy, Robert L.
Koletar, Susan L.
Carlson, Margrit
Reichman, Richard C.
Bastow, Barbara
Klingman, Karin L.
Kuritzkes, Daniel R.
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Weill Med Coll, Div Int Med & Infect Dis, Cornell HIV Clin Trials Unit, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Stat & Data Anal Ctr, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Univ Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[4] QuestDiagnost Inc, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Univ Alabama, Birmingham, AL USA
[6] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[7] Univ So Calif, Med Ctr, Los Angeles, CA USA
[8] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[9] Northwestern Univ, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[10] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[11] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
[12] Univ Rochester, Rochester, NY USA
[13] Social & Sci Syst Inc, Silver Spring, MD USA
[14] NIAID, Div AIDS, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[15] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[16] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[17] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Jefferson Med Coll, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2006年 / 296卷 / 07期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.296.7.769
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context Three-drug antiretroviral regimens are standard of care for initial treatment of human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) infection, but a 4-drug regimen could improve antiretroviral activity and be more effective than a 3-drug regimen. Objective To compare the safety/efficacy of 3-drug vs 4-drug regimens for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection. Design The AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) A5095 study, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with enrollment and follow-up conducted from March 22, 2001, to March 1, 2005, and enrolling treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected patients with HIV-1 RNA levels of 400 copies/mL or greater from US clinical trials units of the ACTG. Interventions Zidovudine/lamivudine plus efavirenz (3-drug regimen) vs zidovudine/ lamivudine/abacavir plus efavirenz (4-drug regimen). Main Outcome Measures Time to virologic failure ( defined as time to first of 2 successive HIV-1 RNA levels >= 200 copies/mL at or after week 16), CD4 cell count changes, and grade 3 or 4 adverse events. HIV-1 RNA data were intent-to-treat, regardless of treatment changes. Results Seven hundred sixty-five patients with a baseline mean HIV-1 RNA level of 4.86 log(10) ( 72 444) copies/mL and CD4 cell count of 240 cells/mm(3) were randomized. After a median 3-year follow-up, 99 (26%) of 382 and 94 (25%) of 383 patients receiving the 3-drug and 4-drug regimens, respectively, reached protocol-defined virologic failure; time to virologic failure was not significantly different ( hazard ratio, 0.95; 97.5% confidence interval, 0.69-1.33; P=. 73). In planned subgroup analyses, increased risk for virologic failure was seen in non-Hispanic black patients ( adjusted hazard ratio, 1.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-2.34; P=. 003). At 3 years, the HIV-1 RNA level was less than 200 copies/mL in 152 (90%) of 169 and 143 (92%) of 156 patients receiving the 3-drug and 4-drug regimens, respectively ( P=. 59), and less than 50 copies/mL in 144 (85%) of 169 and 137 (88%) of 156 patients ( P=. 39). CD4 cell count increases and grade 3 or 4 adverse events were not significantly different. Conclusions In treatment-naive patients, there were no significant differences between the 3-drug and 4-drug antiretroviral regimens; overall, at least approximately 80% of patients had HIV-1 RNA levels less than 50 copies/mL through 3 years. These results support current guidelines recommending 2 nucleosides plus efavirenz for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection; adding abacavir as a fourth drug provided no additional benefit.
引用
收藏
页码:769 / 781
页数:13
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Nelfinavir, efavirenz, or both after the failure of nucleoside treatment of HIV infection. [J].
Albrecht, MA ;
Bosch, RJ ;
Hammer, SM ;
Liou, SH ;
Kessler, H ;
Para, MF ;
Eron, J ;
Valdez, H ;
Dehlinger, M ;
Katzenstein, DA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (06) :398-407
[2]   Different degree of immune recovery using antiretroviral regimens with protease inhibitors or non-nucleosides [J].
Barreiro, P ;
Soriano, V ;
Casas, E ;
González-Lahoz, J .
AIDS, 2002, 16 (02) :245-249
[3]   Hypersensitivity syndrome associated with efavirenz therapy [J].
Bossi, P ;
Colin, D ;
Bricaire, F ;
Caumes, E .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2000, 30 (01) :227-228
[4]   Self-reported adherence to antiretroviral medications among participants in HIV clinical trials: the AACTG Adherence Instruments [J].
Chesney, MA ;
Ickovics, JR ;
Chambers, DB ;
Gifford, AL ;
Neidig, J ;
Zwickl, B ;
Wu, AW .
AIDS CARE-PSYCHOLOGICAL AND SOCIO-MEDICAL ASPECTS OF AIDS/HIV, 2000, 12 (03) :255-266
[5]  
Clavel F, 2004, NEW ENGL J MED, V350, P1023, DOI 10.1056/NEJM2ra025195
[6]   The abacavir hypersensitivity reaction: A review [J].
Clay, PG .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2002, 24 (10) :1502-1514
[7]   Residual HIV-1 RNA in blood plasma of patients taking suppressive highly active antiretroviral therapy [J].
Dornadula, G ;
Zhang, H ;
VanUitert, B ;
Stern, J ;
Livornese, L ;
Ingerman, MJ ;
Witek, J ;
Kedanis, RJ ;
Natkin, J ;
DeSimone, J ;
Pomerantz, RJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (17) :1627-1632
[8]   A randomized trial of 2 different 4-drug antiretroviral regimens versus a 3-drug regimen, in advanced human immunodeficiency virus disease [J].
Fischl, MA ;
Ribaudo, HJ ;
Collier, AC ;
Erice, A ;
Giuliano, M ;
Dehlinger, M ;
Eron, JJ ;
Saag, MS ;
Hammer, SM ;
Vella, S ;
Morse, GD ;
Feinberg, JE .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2003, 188 (05) :625-634
[9]   Persistence of HIV-1 transcription in peripheral-blood mononuclear cells in patients receiving potent antiretroviral therapy [J].
Furtado, MR ;
Callaway, DS ;
Phair, JP ;
Kunstman, KJ ;
Stanton, JL ;
Macken, CA ;
Perelson, AS ;
Wolinsky, SM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (21) :1614-1622
[10]   Efficacy and safety of tenofovir DF vs stavuldine in combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive patients - A 3-year randomized trial [J].
Gallant, JE ;
Staszewski, S ;
Pozniak, AL ;
DeJesus, E ;
Suleiman, JMAH ;
Miller, MD ;
Coakley, DF ;
Lu, B ;
Toole, JJ ;
Cheng, AK .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 292 (02) :191-201