On the effect of probability distributions of input variables in public health risk assessment

被引:19
作者
Hamed, MM
Bedient, PB
机构
[1] Dept. of Environ. Sci. and Eng., Rice University, Houston, TX 77005-1892
关键词
risk assessment; uncertainty analysis; first-order reliability method; probability distribution; sensitivity measures;
D O I
10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00848.x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
A central part of probabilistic public health risk assessment is the selection of probability distributions for the uncertain input variables. In this paper, we apply the first-order reliability method (FORM)((1-31)) as a probabilistic tool to assess the effect of probability distributions of the input random variables on the probability that risk exceeds a threshold level (termed the probability of failure) and on the relevant probabilistic sensitivities. The analysis was applied to a case study given by Thompson et al.((4)) on cancer risk caused by the ingestion of benzene contaminated soil. Normal, lognormal, and uniform distributions were used in the analysis. The results show that the selection of a probability distribution function for the uncertain variables in this case study had a moderate impact on the probability that values would fall above a given threshold risk when the threshold risk is at the 50th percentile of the original distribution given by Thompson et al.((4)) The impact was much greater when the threshold risk level was at the 95th percentile. The impact on uncertainty sensitivity, however, showed a reversed trend, where the impact was more appreciable for the 50th percentile of the original distribution of risk given by Thompson et al.((4)) than for the 95th percentile. Nevertheless, the choice of distribution shape did not alter the order of probabilistic sensitivity of the basic uncertain variables.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 105
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], UNCERTAINTY ENV HLTH
[2]   BIVARIATE DISTRIBUTIONS FOR HEIGHT AND WEIGHT OF MEN AND WOMEN IN THE UNITED-STATES [J].
BRAINARD, J ;
BURMASTER, DE .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1992, 12 (02) :267-275
[3]   CORRELATED INPUTS IN QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT - THE EFFECTS OF DISTRIBUTIONAL SHAPE [J].
BUKOWSKI, J ;
KORN, L ;
WARTENBERG, D .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1995, 15 (02) :215-219
[4]  
Burmaster D E, 1991, J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol, V1, P491
[5]  
Finkel A. M., 1990, Confronting Uncertainty in Risk Management: A Guide for Decision Makers a Report
[6]   THE BENEFITS OF PROBABILISTIC EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT - 3 CASE-STUDIES INVOLVING CONTAMINATED AIR, WATER, AND SOIL [J].
FINLEY, B ;
PAUSTENBACH, D .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1994, 14 (01) :53-73
[7]   PROBABILISTIC SCREENING TOOL FOR GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION ASSESSMENT [J].
HAMED, MM ;
CONTE, JP ;
BEDIENT, PB .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1995, 121 (11) :767-775
[8]   Probabilistic modeling of aquifer heterogeneity using reliability methods [J].
Hamed, MM ;
Bedient, PB ;
Dawson, CN .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 1996, 19 (05) :277-295
[9]   Numerical stochastic analysis of groundwater contaminant transport and plume containment [J].
Hamed, MM ;
Bedient, PB ;
Conte, JP .
JOURNAL OF CONTAMINANT HYDROLOGY, 1996, 24 (01) :1-24
[10]  
HAMED MM, IN PRESS RISK ANAL