Rapid on-site evaluation during endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for the diagnosis of hilar and mediastinal lymphadenopathy in patients with lung cancer

被引:70
作者
Guo, Hongbo [1 ]
Liu, Sujing [2 ]
Guo, Jun [3 ]
Li, Bobo [1 ]
Li, Wanhu [4 ]
Lu, Zuowei [5 ]
Sun, Jujie [6 ]
Zhang, Baijiang [1 ]
Yu, Jinming [2 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Canc Hosp & Inst, Dept Thorac Surg, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Canc Hosp & Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Canc Hosp & Inst, Dept Med Oncol, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
[4] Shandong Canc Hosp & Inst, Dept Radiol, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
[5] Shandong Canc Hosp & Inst, Dept Cytol, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
[6] Shandong Canc Hosp & Inst, Dept Pathol, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
关键词
Lymph node; Diagnosis; Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration; Rapid on-site evaluation; Lung cancer; CYTOLOGIC EVALUATION; LYMPH-NODES; EBUS-TBNA; MUTATION; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.1016/j.canlet.2015.11.038
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
The purpose of this study was to assess the usefulness of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) during endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and the interpretation of its results. Based on the criterion of using ROSE or not, 236 patients with known or suspected lung cancer undergoing EBUS-TBNA were allocated into the ROSE group (122 patients with 252 lymph nodes) and non-ROSE group (114 patients with 260 lymph nodes). In the ROSE group, the percentages of the suspicious specimens on cytology and non-diagnostic specimens on pathology were both significantly lower than that in the non-ROSE group (8.7% vs. 14.6%, p = 0.038; and 0.9% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.018, respectively), and 13 out of 22 suspicious lesions on ROSE were confirmed with definite diagnoses on TBNA pathology. The diagnostic yield stratified by pathology was significantly higher in the ROSE group than that in the non ROSE group (90.5% vs. 81.2%, p = 0.003). These results suggest that ROSE during EBUS-TBNA allows for a low rate of suspicious results and therefore improves the diagnostic yield stratified by pathology when sampling hilar or mediastinal lymphadenopathy in patients with lung cancer. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:182 / 186
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]
Test performance of endobronchial ultrasound and transbronchial needle aspiration biopsy for mediastinal staging in patients with lung cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Adams, K. ;
Shah, P. L. ;
Edmonds, L. ;
Lim, E. .
THORAX, 2009, 64 (09) :757-762
[2]
Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial fine-needle aspiration [J].
Alsharif, Mariam ;
Andrade, Rafael S. ;
Groth, Shawn S. ;
Stelow, Edward B. ;
Pambuccian, Stefan E. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2008, 130 (03) :434-443
[3]
[Anonymous], AM J CLIN PATHOL
[4]
Impact of rapid on-site cytologic evaluation during transbronchial needle aspiration [J].
Baram, D ;
Garcia, RB ;
Richman, PS .
CHEST, 2005, 128 (02) :869-875
[5]
Bruno P, 2011, ANTICANCER RES, V31, P4207
[6]
Improved Laboratory Resource Utilization and Patient Care With the Use of Rapid On-Site Evaluation for Endobronchial Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy [J].
Collins, Brian T. ;
Chen, Alexander C. ;
Wang, Jeff F. ;
Bernadt, Cory T. ;
Sanati, Souzan .
CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2013, 121 (10) :544-551
[7]
RAPID ON-SITE EVALUATION OF TRANSBRONCHIAL ASPIRATES [J].
DAVENPORT, RD .
CHEST, 1990, 98 (01) :59-61
[8]
Screening for Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Management of Lung Cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines [J].
Detterbeck, Frank C. ;
Mazzone, Peter J. ;
Naidich, David P. ;
Bach, Peter B. .
CHEST, 2013, 143 (05) :E78-E92
[9]
Utility of rapid on-site evaluation of transbronchial needle aspirates [J].
Diacon, AH ;
Schuurmans, MM ;
Theron, J ;
Louw, M ;
Wright, CA ;
Brundyn, K ;
Bolliger, CT .
RESPIRATION, 2005, 72 (02) :182-188
[10]
It is time for this 'ROSE' to flower [J].
Gasparini, S .
RESPIRATION, 2005, 72 (02) :129-131