Reduction of nitrate leaching with haying or grazing and omission of nitrogen fertilizer

被引:16
作者
Owens, LB [1 ]
Bonta, JV [1 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Coshocton, OH 43812 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/jeq2004.1230
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In some high-fertility, high-stocking-density grazing systems, nitrate (NO3) leaching can be great, and ground water NO3-N concentrations can exceed maximum contaminant levels. To reduce high N leaching losses and concentrations, alternative management practices need to be used. At the North Appalachian Experimental Watershed near Coshocton, OH, two management practices were studied with regard to reducing NO3-N concentrations in ground water. This was following a fertilized, rotational grazing management practice from which ground water NO3-N concentrations exceeded maximum contaminant levels. Using four small watersheds (each approximately I ha), rotational grazing of a grass forage without N fertilizer being applied and unfertilized grass forage removed as hay were used as alternative management practices to the previous fertilized pastures. Ground water was sampled at spring developments, which drained the watershed areas, over a 7-yr period. Peak ground water NO3-N concentrations before the 7-yr study period ranged from 13 to 25.5 mg L-1. Ground water NO3-N concentrations progressively decreased under each watershed and both management practices. Following five years of the alternative management practices, ground water NO3-N concentrations ranged from 2.1 to 3.9 mg L-1. Both grazing and haying, without N fertilizer being applied to the forage, were similarly effective in reducing the NO3-N levels in ground water. This research shows two management practices that can be effective in reducing high NO3-N concentrations resulting from high-fertility, high-stocking density grazing systems, including an option to continue grazing.
引用
收藏
页码:1230 / 1237
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Anger M, 2002, J PLANT NUTR SOIL SC, V165, P640, DOI 10.1002/1522-2624(200210)165:5<640::AID-JPLN640>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-F
[3]  
*ASS OFF AN CHEM, 1984, OFF METH AN
[4]  
BRAKENSIEK DL, 1979, AH224 USDA
[5]   An analysis of environmental and economic implications of nil and restricted grazing systems designed to reduce nitrate leaching from New Zealand dairy farms. I. Nitrogen losses [J].
de Klein, CAM ;
Ledgard, SF .
NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2001, 44 (2-3) :201-215
[6]   Nitrate leaching and pasture production from different nitrogen sources on a shallow stoney soil under flood-irrigated dairy pasture [J].
Di, HJ ;
Cameron, KC .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH, 2002, 40 (02) :317-334
[7]  
Fowler D., 1997, P147
[8]   NITRATE LEACHING FROM A SMALL, UNDERDRAINED, GRASSLAND, CLAY CATCHMENT [J].
HAIGH, RA ;
WHITE, RE .
SOIL USE AND MANAGEMENT, 1986, 2 (02) :65-70
[9]  
HARROLD LL, 1958, USDA TECH B, V1179
[10]  
KELLEY GE, 1975, USDA ARS MISC PUBL, V1296