Market rigidities and labour market flexibility: An international comparison

被引:26
作者
Salvanes, KG
机构
[1] Norwegian Sch. Econ. and Bus. Admin.
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1467-9442.00065
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The effects of product and labour market rigidities on labour market dynamics are analysed using a panel of two-digit ISIC level data for seven OECD countries. As expected, employment protection was found to slacken labour market flows. Centralized wage bargaining also reduced the degree of job turnover, although a priori the effect of centralized wage bargaining on labour market flexibility is not clear. Industry subsidies have a positive impact on job reallocation by increasing job creation. The labour market dynamics are also compared in detail for two economies regarded as extremes in terms of regulations, the U.S. and Norway.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 333
页数:19
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
ALBAEK S, 1995, 9512 DP U COP I EC
[2]  
[Anonymous], NBER MACROECONOMICS
[3]  
BALDWIN J, 1994, 4776 NBER WP
[4]   EMPLOYMENT GROWTH, INCUMBENTS AND ENTRANTS - EVIDENCE FROM GERMANY [J].
BOERI, T ;
CRAMER, U .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 1992, 10 (04) :545-565
[5]  
BROERSMA L, 1995, UNPUB JOB FLOWS DUTC
[6]  
Calmfors Lars, 1988, Economic Policy, V3
[7]  
DAVIS SJ, 1990, NBER MACROECON ANN, P123
[8]  
DAVIS SJ, 1992, Q J ECON, V107, P818
[9]   PLANT TURNOVER AND GROSS EMPLOYMENT FLOWS IN THE UNITED-STATES MANUFACTURING SECTOR [J].
DUNNE, T ;
ROBERTS, MJ ;
SAMUELSON, L .
JOURNAL OF LABOR ECONOMICS, 1989, 7 (01) :48-71
[10]  
GARIBALDI P, UNEMPLOYMENT POLICY