Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: changing patterns of vascular access, radial versus femoral artery

被引:95
作者
Hetherington, S. L. [1 ]
Adam, Z. [1 ]
Morley, R. [1 ]
de Belder, M. A. [1 ]
Hall, J. A. [1 ]
Muir, D. F. [1 ]
Sutton, A. G. C. [1 ]
Swanson, N. [1 ]
Wright, R. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] James Cook Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Middlesbrough TS4 3BW, Cleveland, England
关键词
CONTRAST-INDUCED NEPHROPATHY; VS. TRANSFEMORAL APPROACH; TRANSRADIAL APPROACH; PRIMARY ANGIOPLASTY; METAANALYSIS; TRANSFUSION; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1136/hrt.2009.170233
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To examine the safety and efficacy of emergency transradial primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Design: Single-centre observational study with data collection. Setting: A regional cardiac centre, United Kingdom. Patients: 1051 consecutive patients admitted with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, without cardiogenic shock, between November 2004 and October 2008. Interventions: Percutaneous coronary interventions by radial and femoral access. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measures were procedural success, major vascular complication and failed initial access strategy. outcomes were in-hospital mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, needle-to-balloon times, contrast volume used, radiation dose absorbed time to discharge. Multiple regression analysis was to adjust for potential differences between the groups. Results: 571 patients underwent radial access and femoral. A variable preference for radial access was observed among the lead operators (between 21% and 90%). Procedural success was similar between the and femoral groups, but major vascular complications were more frequent at the site of femoral access (0% radial versus 1.9% femoral, p = 0.001). Failure of the initial access strategy was more frequent in the radial group (7.7% versus 0.6%, p<0.001). Adjustment for other procedural and clinical predictors did not alter findings. Needle-to-balloon time, as a measure of procedural efficiency, was equal for radial and femoral groups. Conclusions: In the setting of acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction without cardiogenic shock, primary angioplasty is safe, with comparable outcomes to a femoral approach and a lower risk of vascular complications.
引用
收藏
页码:1612 / 1618
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures - Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials [J].
Agostoni, P ;
Biondi-Zoccai, GGL ;
De Benedictis, ML ;
Rigattieri, S ;
Turri, M ;
Anselmi, M ;
Vassanelli, C ;
Zardini, P ;
Louvard, Y ;
Hamon, M .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 44 (02) :349-356
[2]   BLEEDING COMPLICATIONS WITH THE CHIMERIC ANTIBODY TO PLATELET GLYCOPROTEIN IIB/IIIA INTEGRIN IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION [J].
AGUIRRE, FV ;
TOPOL, EJ ;
FERGUSON, JJ ;
ANDERSON, K ;
BLANKENSHIP, JC ;
HEUSER, RR ;
SIGMON, K ;
TAYLOR, M ;
GOTTLIEB, R ;
HANOVICH, G ;
ROSENBERG, M ;
DONOHUE, TJ ;
WEISMAN, HF ;
CALIFF, RM .
CIRCULATION, 1995, 91 (12) :2882-2890
[3]   Randomised comparison of femoral versus radial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention using abciximab in acute myocardial infarction: results of the FARMI Trial [J].
Brasselet, Camille ;
Tassan, Sophie ;
Nazeyrollas, Pierre ;
Hamon, Martial ;
Metz, Damien .
HEART, 2007, 93 (12) :1556-1561
[4]   USE OF A MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY DIRECTED AGAINST THE PLATELET GLYCOPROTEIN IIB/IIIA RECEPTOR IN HIGH-RISK CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY [J].
CALIFF, RM ;
SHADOFF, N ;
VALETT, N ;
BATES, E ;
GALEANA, A ;
KNOPF, W ;
SHAFTEL, J ;
BENDER, MJ ;
AVERSANO, T ;
RAQUENO, J ;
GURBEL, P ;
COWFER, J ;
COHEN, M ;
CROSS, P ;
BITTL, J ;
EDDINGS, K ;
TAYLOR, M ;
DEROSA, K ;
HATTEL, L ;
COOPER, L ;
ESHELMAN, B ;
FINTEL, D ;
NIEMYSKI, P ;
KLEIN, L ;
KENNEDY, H ;
THORNTON, T ;
KEREIAKES, D ;
MARTIN, L ;
ANDERSON, L ;
HIGBY, N ;
ELLIS, S ;
BREZINA, K ;
GEORGE, B ;
CHAPEKIS, A ;
SMITH, D ;
ANWAR, A ;
GERBER, TL ;
PRITCHARD, GL ;
MYLER, R ;
SHAW, R ;
MURPHY, M ;
WARD, K ;
MADIGAN, NP ;
BLANKENSHIP, J ;
HALBERT, M ;
FLANAGAN, C ;
TANNENBAUM, M ;
POLICH, M ;
STEVENSON, C ;
TCHENG, J .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 330 (14) :956-961
[5]   Radial versus femoral access for emergent percutaneous coronary intervention with adjunct glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in acute myocardial infarction - the RADIAL-AMI pilot randomized trial [J].
Cantor, WJ ;
Puley, G ;
Natarajan, MK ;
Dzavik, V ;
Madan, M ;
Fry, A ;
Kim, HH ;
Velianou, JL ;
Pirani, N ;
Strauss, BH ;
Chisholm, RJ .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2005, 150 (03) :543-549
[6]   Association of the arterial access site at angioplasty with transfusion and mortality: the MORTAL study (Mortality benefit Of Reduced Transfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention via the Arm or Leg) [J].
Chase, A. J. ;
Fretz, E. B. ;
Warburton, W. P. ;
Klinke, W. P. ;
Carere, R. G. ;
Pi, D. ;
Berry, B. ;
Hilton, J. D. .
HEART, 2008, 94 (08) :1019-1025
[7]   Decreased complication rates using the transradial compared to the transfemoral approach in percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of routine stenting and glycoprotein platelet IIb/IIIa inhibitor use: A large single-center experience [J].
Eichhoefer, Jonas ;
Horlick, Eric ;
Ivanov, Joan ;
Seidelin, Peter H. ;
Ross, John R. ;
Ing, Douglas ;
Daly, Paul ;
Mackie, Karen ;
Ridley, Brenda ;
Schwartz, Leonard ;
Barolet, Alan ;
Dzavik, Vladimir .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2008, 156 (05) :864-870
[8]   Radiation dose in interventional fluoroscopic procedures [J].
Geise, RA ;
O'Dea, TJ .
APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 1999, 50 (01) :173-184
[9]   Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials [J].
Jolly, Sanjit S. ;
Amlani, Shoaib ;
Hamon, Martial ;
Yusuf, Salim ;
Mehta, Shamir R. .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2009, 157 (01) :132-140
[10]   Long-term survival benefits of coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty patients with coronary artery disease [J].
Jones, RH ;
Kesler, K ;
Phillips, HR ;
Mark, DB ;
Smith, PK ;
Nelson, CL ;
Newman, MF ;
Reves, JG ;
Anderson, RW ;
Califf, RM .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1996, 111 (05) :1013-1023