Assessing potentially inappropriate prescribing in the elderly veterans affairs population using the HEDIS 2006 quality measure

被引:83
作者
Pugh, Mary Jo V.
Hanlon, Joseph T.
Zeber, John E.
Bierman, Arlene
Cornell, John
Berlowitz, Dan R.
机构
[1] VERDICT, S Texas Vet Healthcare Syst, Audie L Murphy Div 11C6, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[2] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, San Antonio, TX USA
[3] Vet Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare Syst, Ctr Geriatr Res Educ & Clin, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Vet Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare Syst, Ctr Hlth Equit Res, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Geriatr Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[6] Univ Toronto, Sch Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Sch Nursing, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] VA Hlth Serv Res & Dev Serv, Ctr Hlth Qual Outcomes & Econ Res, Bedford, MA USA
[9] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02215 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE PHARMACY | 2006年 / 12卷 / 07期
关键词
geriatrics; quality of health care; benchmarking; pharmacoepidemiology;
D O I
10.18553/jmcp.2006.12.7.537
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Studies have found that 20% to 25% of older patients receive drugs identified as inappropriate by the 1997 Beers criteria. After the addition of 22 new drugs to the 2003 Beers criteria, the National Committee on Quality Assurance convened an expert consensus panel to identify which drugs from the 2003 Beers criteria should always be avoided in the elderly. The resulting list of drugs to avoid was added to the 2006 Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) to measure the quality of prescribing for the elderly. OBJECTIVE: To use HEDIS 2006 criteria to determine the rate of potentially inappropriate prescribing in the elderly (PIPE) and to determine if patient risk factors are similar to those found using Beers criteria. METHODS: This cross-sectional database study identified older patients receiving drugs included in the HEDIS 2006 criteria using national data from the Veterans Health Administration. Patients aged 65 years or older on October 1, 1999, with at least 2 outpatient visit days during fiscal year 2000, ending September 30, or outpatient visits in fiscal years 1999 and 2000 were included (N = 1,096,361). Multivariable logistic regression analyses stratified by gender identified patient characteristics associated with increased risk of HEDIS 2006 drug exposure. Since oral estrogens were considered appropriate at the time of this study, they were excluded from the list of HEDIS 2006 drugs. RESULTS: Overall, 19.6% of older veterans were exposed to HEDIS 2006 drugs-23.3% of older veteran women and 19.2% of older veteran men. The most commonly prescribed HEDIS 2006 drugs were antihistamines (received by 9.0% of men and 10.7% of women), opioid analgesics (received by 4.6% of men and 5.8% of women), and skeletal muscle relaxants (received by 4.3% of men and 5.3% of women). Propoxyphene was the most commonly used HEDIS 2006 drug, received by 4.5% of men and 5.7% of women, followed by diphenhydramine, received by 3.5% of men and 4.7% of women, and hydroxyzine, received by 3.2% of both men and women. Patients receiving 10 or more medications of any type were at greatest risk of exposure. Men were 8.2 times more likely to receive at least 1 HEDIS 2006 drug than those taking 1 to 3 drugs of any type (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.0-8.4), while women were 9.6 times more likely (95% Cl, 8.2-11.2). CONCLUSIONS: Even though we included a slightly different list of drugs to avoid, results for the HEDIS 2006 measure were similar to those of the 1997 Beers criteria. The HEDIS 2006 drugs are commonly prescribed, and there is a distinct need for direct evidence linking HEDIS 2006 PIPE exposure to adverse patient outcomes. To reduce PIPE, it seems necessary to provide additional evidence for clinicians through the conducting of a well-designed study to assess patient outcomes associated with PIPE exposure as defined by the HEDIS criteria.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / 545
页数:9
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Aparasu Rajender R, 2004, Am J Geriatr Pharmacother, V2, P102, DOI 10.1016/S1543-5946(04)90015-3
[2]   WHAT CONSTITUTES GOOD PRESCRIBING [J].
BARBER, N .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 310 (6984) :923-925
[3]   Comparison of rates of potentially inappropriate medication use according to the Zhan criteria for VA versus private sector Medicare HMOs [J].
Barnett, Mitchell J. ;
Perry, Paul J. ;
Langstaff, Jodi D. ;
Kaboli, Peter J. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE PHARMACY, 2006, 12 (05) :362-370
[4]  
BEERS MH, 1991, ARCH INTERN MED, V151, P1825
[5]   Explicit criteria for determining potentially inappropriate medication use by the elderly - An update [J].
Beers, MH .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 157 (14) :1531-1536
[6]   Longitudinal assessment of inpatient use and functioning of seriously mentally ill veterans with and without co-occurring substance use disorders [J].
Blow, FC ;
Barry, KL ;
BootsMiller, BJ ;
Copeland, LA ;
McCormick, R ;
Visnic, S .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 1998, 32 (05) :311-319
[7]   Evaluation of nationally mandated drug use reviews to improve patient safety in nursing homes: A natural experiment [J].
Briesacher, B ;
Limcangco, R ;
Simoni-Wastila, L ;
Doshi, J ;
Gurwitz, J .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2005, 53 (06) :991-996
[8]   Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framewouk for improvement [J].
Cabana, MD ;
Rand, CS ;
Powe, NR ;
Wu, AW ;
Wilson, MH ;
Abboud, PAC ;
Rubin, HR .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (15) :1458-1465
[9]   Persistent pain and depression: A biopsychosocial perspective [J].
Campbell, LC ;
Clauw, DJ ;
Keefe, FJ .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 54 (03) :399-409
[10]   Inappropriate medication administration to the acutely ill elderly: A nationwide emergency department study, 1992-2000 [J].
Caterino, JM ;
Emond, JA ;
Camargo, CA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2004, 52 (11) :1847-1855