Estimation of three-class ideal observer decision functions with a Bayesian artificial neural network

被引:11
作者
Edwards, DC [1 ]
Metz, CE [1 ]
Nishikawa, RM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Radiol, Kurt Rossmann Labs Radiol Image Res, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
来源
MEDICAL IMAGING 2002: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT | 2002年 / 4686卷
关键词
Bayesian artificial neural network; ideal observer estimation; three-class classification;
D O I
10.1117/12.462662
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
We are using Bayesian artificial neural networks (BANNs) to eliminate false-positive detections in our computer-aided diagnosis schemes. In the present work, we investigated whether BANNs can be used to estimate likelihood ratio, or ideal observer, decision functions for distinguishing observations which are drawn from three classes. Three univariate normal distributions were chosen representing three classes. We sampled 3,000 values of x for each of 10 training datasets, and 3,000 values of x for a single testing dataset. A BANN was trained on each training dataset, and the two outputs from each trained BANN, which estimate p(class 1\x) and p(class 2\x), were recorded for each value of x in the testing dataset. The mean BANN output and its standard error were calculated using the ten sets of BANN output. We repeated the above procedure to estimate the means and standard errors of the two likelihood ratio decision functions p(x\class 1)/p(x\class 3) and p(x\class 2)/p(x\class 3). We found that the BANN can estimate the a posteriori class probabilities quite accurately, except in regions of data space where outcomes are unlikely. Estimation of the Likelihood ratios is more problematic, which we attribute to error amplification caused by taking the ratio of two imprecise estimates. We hope to improve these estimates by constraining the BANN training procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 12
页数:12
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Eliminating false-positive microcalcification clusters in a mammography CAD scheme using a Bayesian neural network [J].
Edwards, DC ;
Papaioannou, J ;
Jiang, YL ;
Kupinski, MA ;
Nishikawa, RM .
MEDICAL IMAGING: 2001: IMAGE PROCESSING, PTS 1-3, 2001, 4322 :1954-1960
[2]  
Edwards DC, 2001, IWDM 2000: 5TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, P168
[3]  
Egan JP., 1975, SIGNAL DETECTION THE
[4]  
Gelfand I., 1963, CALCULUS VARIATIONS
[5]   Ideal observer approximation using Bayesian classification neural networks [J].
Kupinski, MA ;
Edwards, DC ;
Giger, ML ;
Metz, CE .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2001, 20 (09) :886-899
[6]  
MACKAY DJC, 1992, BAYESIAN METHODS ADA
[7]  
NISHIKAWA RM, 1994, INT CONGR SER, V1069, P13
[8]  
Ruck D W, 1990, IEEE Trans Neural Netw, V1, P296, DOI 10.1109/72.80266
[9]  
Van Trees H.L., 2013, DETECTION ESTIMATION
[10]   An improved shift-invariant artificial neural network for computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms [J].
Zhang, W ;
Doi, K ;
Giger, ML ;
Nishikawa, RM ;
Schmidt, RA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1996, 23 (04) :595-601