Estimating design floods based on the critical storm duration for small watersheds

被引:25
作者
Kang, M. S. [1 ]
Goo, J. H. [2 ]
Song, I. [3 ]
Chun, J. A. [4 ]
Her, Y. G. [5 ]
Hwang, S. W. [6 ]
Park, S. W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Res Inst Agr & Life Sci, Dept Rural Syst Engn, Seoul 151921, South Korea
[2] Konkuk Univ, Dept Adv Technol Fus, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Res Inst Agr & Life Sci, Seoul 151921, South Korea
[4] APEC Climate Ctr, Climate Res Dept, Pusan, South Korea
[5] Purdue Univ, Dept Agr & Biol Engn, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[6] Univ Florida, Dept Agr & Biol Engn, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
Design peak runoff; Critical storm duration; Hydrologic model; Curve number; Small watershed; CRITICAL RAINFALL DURATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jher.2013.01.003
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to propose a new method to determine design floods using the critical storm duration concept. Five different models, including the Rational, SCS, and Clark methods, were used to estimate peak discharges, while the uniform distribution, Mononobe, Huff, and Yen and Chow methods were applied for the determination of temporal rainfall distribution. Two small watersheds, Baran (HP#6) and Banweol (WS#1), for which watershed hydrologic data were available since 1996, were selected as the study areas. A total of 41 rainfall events was chosen from the study watersheds to calculate peak runoffs and evaluate the performances of the selected hydrological models based on the statistics of RMSE, Nash efficiency criterion (NEC), and R-2 value. The Clark method performed the best overall among the selected models, with both NEC and R-2 values greater than 0.95. The Huff method resulted in the longest critical storm duration, which was much greater than the times of concentration. The increase in the recurrence interval decreased the critical storm duration while increasing the peak flow rates. The SCS model estimated the greatest design floods, 94.2 m(3)/s for HP#6 and 56.4 m(3)/s for WS#1, with a 25-year return period. The design floods for the study watersheds that were estimated by the selected hydrologic models ranged from 68.3 to 132.1% of those estimated by the Rational method. The greatest to the smallest peak flows resulted from the SCS, WFRP, Clark and Nakayasu methods in order. As an alternative to the Rational method, the WFRP method may be appropriate for rural watershed areas in Korea, where paddy fields commonly exist, whereas the SCS model may be more suitable for urban areas, where most land surfaces are covered with impervious material. It was concluded that the incorporation of a critical storm duration concept can contribute to the advance of design flood estimation method in Korea. (C) 2013 International Association for Hydro-environment Engineering and Research, Asia Pacific Division. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 218
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1985, NAT ENG HDB
[2]  
[Anonymous], URB HYDR SMALL WAT
[3]  
Bedient P.B., 2002, Hydrology and floodplain analysis
[4]  
Bonta JV, 2004, APPL ENG AGRIC, V20, P641
[5]  
Bonta JV, 2001, T ASAE, V44, P1593
[6]  
Campana N., 2001, URBAN WATER, V3, P113
[7]   CRITICAL RAINFALL DURATION FOR MAXIMUM DISCHARGE FROM OVERLAND PLANE [J].
CHEN, CN ;
WONG, TSW .
JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1993, 119 (09) :1040-1045
[8]  
Clark CO., 1945, T ASCE, V10, P1014
[9]  
Debo T.N., 1995, Municipal Storm Water Management
[10]  
Goo J.H., 2001, THESIS SEOUL NATL U