The Edinburgh-Durham Southern Galaxy Catalogue .8. The cluster galaxy luminosity function

被引:53
作者
Lumsden, SL
Collins, CA
Nichol, RC
Eke, VR
Guzzo, L
机构
[1] LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIV,SCH ELECT ENGN,ASTROPHYS GRP,LIVERPOOL L3 3AF,MERSEYSIDE,ENGLAND
[2] CARNEGIE MELLON UNIV,DEPT PHYS,PITTSBURGH,PA 15213
[3] OSSERV ASTRON BRERA,I-22055 MERATE,ITALY
关键词
catalogues; galaxies; clusters; general; luminosity function; mass function;
D O I
10.1093/mnras/290.1.119
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We have re-examined the nature of the cluster galaxy luminosity function using the data from the Edinburgh-Durham Southern Galaxy Catalogue and the Edinburgh-Milano Redshift Survey. We derive a best-fitting luminosity function (LF) over the range -18 to -21 in M(b(j)), for a composite sample of 22 of the richer clusters that has M(b(j))* = -20.16 +/- 0.02 and alpha = -1.22 +/- -0.04. The dominant error in these values results from the choice of background subtraction method. From extensive simulations we can show that when the LF is fitted over this narrow range, it is difficult to discriminate against bright values of M* in the single cluster fits, but that faint values provide a strong test of the universality of the luminosity function. We find that all the individual cluster data are well-fitted by a Schechter function with or fixed at -1.25, and that less than or equal to 10 per cent of these have fitted values of M* that disagree from the average at the 99 per cent confidence level. We further show that fitting only a single parameter Schechter function to composite subsets of the data can give erroneous results for the derived M*, as might be expected from the known tight correlation between M* and alpha. By considering two parameter fits, the results of Monte Carlo simulations and direct two-sample chi(2) tests, we conclude that there is only weak evidence for differences between the data when broken down into subsets based on physical properties (Bautz-Morgan class, richness, velocity dispersion): from our simulations, only the evidence for a difference between subsets based on velocity dispersion may in fact be significant. However, we find no evidence at all that a Schechter function is not a good model for the intrinsic cluster luminosity function over this absolute magnitude range. Models that invoke strong evolution of galaxy luminosity of all galaxies within clusters are inconsistent with our results.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 138
页数:20
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   A CATALOG OF RICH CLUSTERS OF GALAXIES [J].
ABELL, GO ;
CORWIN, HG ;
OLOWIN, RP .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 1989, 70 (01) :1-138
[2]  
[Anonymous], STARS STELLAR SYSTEM
[3]   THE LUMINOSITY FUNCTION OF THE COMA CLUSTER CORE FOR -25-LESS-THAN-M(R)LESS-THAN-9.4 [J].
BERNSTEIN, GM ;
NICHOL, RC ;
TYSON, JA ;
ULMER, MP ;
WITTMAN, D .
ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 110 (04) :1507-&
[5]   THE EDINBURGH-DURHAM SOUTHERN GALAXY CATALOG .7. THE EDINBURGH-MILANO CLUSTER REDSHIFT SURVEY [J].
COLLINS, CA ;
GUZZO, L ;
NICHOL, RC ;
LUMSDEN, SL .
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 1995, 274 (04) :1071-1092
[6]   THE EDINBURGH-DURHAM SOUTHERN GALAXY CATALOG .3. W(THETA) FROM THE FULL SURVEY [J].
COLLINS, CA ;
NICHOL, RC ;
LUMSDEN, SL .
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 1992, 254 (02) :295-300
[7]   COMPREHENSIVE STUDY OF 12 VERY RICH CLUSTERS OF GALAXIES .1. PHOTOMETRIC TECHNIQUE AND ANALYSIS OF LUMINOSITY FUNCTION [J].
DRESSLER, A .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1978, 223 (03) :765-787
[8]   NEW IMAGES OF THE DISTANT, RICH CLUSTER CL-0939+4713 WITH WFPC2 [J].
DRESSLER, A ;
OEMLER, A ;
SPARKS, WB ;
LUCAS, RA .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 435 (01) :L23-&
[9]   DWARF GALAXIES AT Z=0.2 - PHOTOMETRY OF THE CLUSTER ABELL-963 [J].
DRIVER, SP ;
PHILLIPPS, S ;
DAVIES, JI ;
MORGAN, I ;
DISNEY, MJ .
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 1994, 268 (02) :393-404
[10]  
ELLIS RS, 1983, ORIGIN EVOLUTION GAL, P225