Hovering efficiency comparison of rotary and flapping flight for rigid rectangular wings via dimensionless multi-objective optimization

被引:28
作者
Bayiz, Yagiz [1 ]
Ghanaatpishe, Mohammad [1 ]
Fathy, Hosam [1 ]
Cheng, Bo [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Mech & Nucl Engn, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
revolving wings; Reynolds number; aerodynamic efficiency; lift; power; insect flight; LEADING-EDGE VORTICES; INSECT FLIGHT; FORCE CONTROL; AERODYNAMICS; ROTATION; KINEMATICS; MECHANICS; LIFT; MANEUVERS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1088/1748-3190/aab801
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
120111 [工业工程];
摘要
In this work, a multi-objective optimization framework is developed for optimizing low Reynolds number (Re) hovering flight. This framework is then applied to compare the efficiency of rigid revolving and flapping wings with rectangular shape under varying Re and Rossby number (Ro, or aspect ratio). The proposed framework is capable of generating sets of optimal solutions and Pareto fronts for maximizing the lift coefficient and minimizing the power coefficient in dimensionless space, explicitly revealing the trade-off between lift generation and power consumption. The results indicate that revolving wings are more efficient when the required average lift coefficient (C) over bar (L) is low (< 1 for Re = 100 and <1.6 for Re = 8000), while flapping wings are more efficient in achieving higher (C) over bar (L). With the dimensionless power loading as the single-objective performance measure to be maximized, rotary flight is more efficient than flapping wings for Re > 100 regardless of the amount of energy storage assumed in the flapping wing actuation mechanism, while flapping flight is more efficient for Re < 100. It is observed that wings with low Ro perform better when higher <(C)over bar>(L) is needed, whereas higher Ro cases are more efficient at (C) over bar (L) < 0.9 regions. However, for the selected geometry and Re, the efficiency is weakly dependent on Ro when the dimensionless power loading is maximized.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2013, Search Methodologies: Introductory Tutorials in Optimization and Decision Support Techniques, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-6940-7_15
[2]
[Anonymous], 2017, MATH INTRO ROBOTIC M
[3]
Bayiz YE, 2018, IEEE INT CONF ROBOT, P5519
[4]
Energy-minimizing kinematics in hovering insect flight [J].
Berman, Gordon J. ;
Wang, Z. Jane .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2007, 582 :153-168
[5]
The influence of wing-wake interactions on the production of aerodynamic forces in flapping flight [J].
Birch, JM ;
Dickinson, MH .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2003, 206 (13) :2257-2272
[6]
Bronson J, 2009, IEEE 22 INT C MICR M
[7]
Predicting fruit fly's sensing rate with insect flight simulations [J].
Chang, Song ;
Wang, Z. Jane .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2014, 111 (31) :11246-11251
[8]
Flight mechanics and control of escape manoeuvres in hummingbirds. I. Flight kinematics [J].
Cheng, Bo ;
Tobalske, Bret W. ;
Powers, Donald R. ;
Hedrick, Tyson L. ;
Wethington, Susan M. ;
Chiu, George T. C. ;
Deng, Xinyan .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2016, 219 (22) :3518-3531
[9]
Three-dimensional flow visualization and vorticity dynamics in revolving wings [J].
Cheng, Bo ;
Sane, Sanjay P. ;
Barbera, Giovanni ;
Troolin, Daniel R. ;
Strand, Tyson ;
Deng, Xinyan .
EXPERIMENTS IN FLUIDS, 2013, 54 (01)
[10]
The mechanics and control of pitching manoeuvres in a freely flying hawkmoth (Manduca sexta) [J].
Cheng, Bo ;
Deng, Xinyan ;
Hedrick, Tyson L. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2011, 214 (24) :4092-4106