Determining the stabilizing role of individual torso muscles during rehabilitation exercises

被引:188
作者
Kavcic, N [1 ]
Grenier, S [1 ]
McGill, SM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Fac Appl Hlth Sci, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
关键词
lumbar spine; spine stability; modeling; muscles;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-200406010-00016
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. A systematic biomechanical analysis involving an artificial perturbation applied to individual lumbar muscles in order to assess their potential stabilizing role. Objectives. To identify which torso muscles stabilize the spine during different loading conditions and to identify possible mechanisms of function. Summary of Background Data. Stabilization exercises are thought to train muscle patterns that ensure spine stability; however, little quantification and no consensus exists as to which muscles contribute to stability. Methods. Spine kinematics, external forces, and 14 channels of torso electromyography were recorded for seven stabilization exercises in order to capture the individual motor control strategies adopted by different people. Data were input into a detailed model of the lumbar spine to quantify spine joint forces and stability. The EMG signal for a particular muscle was replaced either unilaterally or bilaterally by a sinusoid, and the resultant change in the stability index was quantified. Results. A direction-dependent-stabilizing role was noticed in the larger, multisegmental muscles, whereas a specific subtle efficiency to generate stability was observed for the smaller, intersegmental spinal muscles. Conclusions. No single muscle dominated in the enhancement of spine stability, and their individual roles were continuously changing across tasks. Clinically, if the goal is to train for stability, enhancing motor patterns that incorporate many muscles rather than targeting just a few is justifiable.
引用
收藏
页码:1254 / 1265
页数:12
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], LOWER BACK PAIN
[2]  
Arnold A S, 2000, Comput Aided Surg, V5, P108, DOI 10.1002/1097-0150(2000)5:2<108::AID-IGS5>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-2
[4]  
BERGMARK A, 1989, ACTA ORTHOP SCAND, V60, P3
[5]   LUMBAR POSTERIOR LIGAMENT INVOLVEMENT DURING EXTREMELY HEAVY LIFTS ESTIMATED FROM FLUOROSCOPIC MEASUREMENTS [J].
CHOLEWICKI, J ;
MCGILL, SM .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1992, 25 (01) :17-28
[6]   Effects of external trunk loads on lumbar spine stability [J].
Cholewicki, J ;
Simons, APD ;
Radebold, A .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2000, 33 (11) :1377-1385
[7]   RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MUSCLE FORCE AND STIFFNESS IN THE WHOLE MAMMALIAN MUSCLE - A SIMULATION STUDY [J].
CHOLEWICKI, J ;
MCGILL, SM .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1995, 117 (03) :339-342
[8]   Mechanical stability of the in vivo lumbar spine: Implications for injury and chronic low back pain [J].
Cholewicki, J ;
McGill, SM .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1996, 11 (01) :1-15
[9]   Relative contribution of trunk muscles to the stability of the lumbar spine during isometric exertions [J].
Cholewicki, J ;
VanVliet, JJ .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2002, 17 (02) :99-105
[10]   THE INTERSEGMENTAL AND MULTISEGMENTAL MUSCLES OF THE LUMBAR SPINE - A BIOMECHANICAL MODEL COMPARING LATERAL STABILIZING POTENTIAL [J].
CRISCO, JJ ;
PANJABI, MM .
SPINE, 1991, 16 (07) :793-799