Comparison of cerebral blood volume measurements using the T1 and T2* methods in normal human brains and brain tumors

被引:40
作者
Hacklander, T
Reichenbach, JR
Modder, U
机构
[1] UNIV DUSSELDORF,DEPT DIAGNOST RADIOL,D-4000 DUSSELDORF,GERMANY
[2] UNIV JENA,INST DIAGNOST & INTERVENT RADIOL,D-6900 JENA,GERMANY
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; perfusion; brain; blood flow; neoplasms; blood; volume;
D O I
10.1097/00004728-199711000-00003
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Regional cerebral blood volume (rCBV) can be determined after bolus injection of a contrast agent by utilizing the susceptibility effect (T2* method) or the relaxation effect (T1 method). The aim of this study was to apply both methods in groups of normal subjects and tumor patients and to compare the results. Method: CBVs in different brain areas were determined from groups of 18 normal subjects and 21 patients with different histologically classified tumors. Measurements were performed using GE sequences on a 1.5 T scanner without echo planar imaging capability. As a measure of quality of a single examination, the temporal behavior of the contrast agent bolus was characterized using parameters such as rise time, peak value, fall rime, and full width at half-maximum of the concentration-time curves. Results: The quality of the T2* measurements was inferior to that obtained with the T1 method. A mean CBV value of 4.1 +/- 1.1 vol% averaged over the entire brain area was found in the normal collective with the T1 method. The value obtained with the T2* method was 2.6 +/- 1.1 vol%. Similar underestimations of the CBV values were also found using the T2* method when evaluating regions of interest in tumor patients. Conclusion: Both methods are able to determine rCBV in routine clinical studies. If the goal is to obtain quick, qualitative multislice information, the T2* method is adequate. For quantitative evaluations, however, the T1 method should be preferred.
引用
收藏
页码:857 / 866
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   CEREBRAL BLOOD-VOLUME MAPS OF GLIOMAS - COMPARISON WITH TUMOR GRADE AND HISTOLOGIC-FINDINGS [J].
ARONEN, HJ ;
GAZIT, IE ;
LOUIS, DN ;
BUCHBINDER, BR ;
PARDO, FS ;
WEISSKOFF, RM ;
HARSH, GR ;
COSGROVE, GR ;
HALPERN, EF ;
HOCHBERG, FH ;
ROSEN, BR .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 191 (01) :41-51
[2]   FUNCTIONAL MAPPING OF THE HUMAN VISUAL-CORTEX BY MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING [J].
BELLIVEAU, JW ;
KENNEDY, DN ;
MCKINSTRY, RC ;
BUCHBINDER, BR ;
WEISSKOFF, RM ;
COHEN, MS ;
VEVEA, JM ;
BRADY, TJ ;
ROSEN, BR .
SCIENCE, 1991, 254 (5032) :716-719
[3]  
Bruening R, 1996, AM J NEURORADIOL, V17, P831
[4]  
DEAN BL, 1992, AM J NEURORADIOL, V13, P39
[5]   MR CONTRAST DUE TO MICROSCOPICALLY HETEROGENEOUS MAGNETIC-SUSCEPTIBILITY - NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS AND APPLICATIONS TO CEREBRAL PHYSIOLOGY [J].
FISEL, CR ;
ACKERMAN, JL ;
BUXTON, RB ;
GARRIDO, L ;
BELLIVEAU, JW ;
ROSEN, BR ;
BRADY, TJ .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1991, 17 (02) :336-347
[6]   DYNAMIC STUDIES OF GADOLINIUM UPTAKE IN BRAIN-TUMORS USING INVERSION-RECOVERY ECHO-PLANAR IMAGING [J].
GOWLAND, P ;
MANSFIELD, P ;
BULLOCK, P ;
STEHLING, M ;
WORTHINGTON, B ;
FIRTH, J .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1992, 26 (02) :241-258
[7]   MEASUREMENT OF REGIONAL CEREBRAL BLOOD-VOLUME BY EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY [J].
GRUBB, RL ;
RAICHLE, ME ;
HIGGINS, CS ;
EICHLING, JO .
ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 1978, 4 (04) :322-328
[8]  
GUCKEL F, 1994, RADIOLOGE, V34, P619
[9]  
GUCKEL F, 1994, J COMPUT ASSIST TOMO, V18, P344, DOI 10.1097/00004728-199405000-00002
[10]   MR-based cerebral blood volume maps as a diagnostic tool for brain tumours [J].
Hacklander, T ;
Hofer, M ;
Reichenbach, J ;
Bettag, JM ;
Kiwit, JCW ;
Herzog, H ;
Modder, U .
FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIETE DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER NEUEN BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 1995, 163 (06) :484-489