The timing of disability measurements following injury

被引:29
作者
Currens, JAB [1 ]
Coats, TJ [1 ]
机构
[1] St Bartholomews & Royal London Sch Med & Dent, Acad Unit Accident & Emergency, London, England
来源
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED | 2000年 / 31卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0020-1383(99)00244-2
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100602 [中西医结合临床];
摘要
Disability following trauma has profound personal, social and economic costs. Currently, measurement of disability is not standardised and no agreed time interval between injury and disability measurement exists. This study was designed to define the best time at which to measure disability following trauma. The functional independence measurement (FIM) and Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) were assessed at 3, 6, 12 and more than 24 months after injury for 201 trauma patients. The best time to measure was defined as the point at which a steady state was reached, i.e. when further functional improvement ceased. Motor FIM showed significant change between 3 and 6 month assessments (p < 0.002) and 6 and 12 months (p < 0.002). No statistically significant change occurred beyond 12 months (p > 0.2). For Cognitive FIM, there was significant change between 3 and 6 months (p = 0.02), but not beyond 6 months (p > 0.2). For GOS there was significant change between 3 and 6 months (p < 0.002) and 6 and 12 months (p < 0.002) but not beyond 12 months (p > 0.2). Disability measurements should be performed 12 months after injury, when patients have reached a steady state. This time of measurement should be adopted as the standard for trauma databases and outcome studies. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 98
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 1980, International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps
[2]
ARMITAGE P, 1994, STAT METHODS MED RES, P125
[3]
INJURY SEVERITY SCORE - METHOD FOR DESCRIBING PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE INJURIES AND EVALUATING EMERGENCY CARE [J].
BAKER, SP ;
ONEILL, B ;
HADDON, W ;
LONG, WB .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1974, 14 (03) :187-196
[4]
BLAND M, 1995, INTRO MED STAT, P146
[5]
EVALUATING TRAUMA CARE - THE TRISS METHOD [J].
BOYD, CR ;
TOLSON, MA ;
COPES, WS .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1987, 27 (04) :370-378
[6]
OUTCOME MEASURES FOR CLINICAL-TRIALS INVOLVING TRAUMATICALLY BRAIN-INJURED PATIENTS - REPORT OF A CONFERENCE [J].
CLIFTON, GL ;
HAYES, RL ;
LEVIN, HS ;
MICHEL, ME ;
CHOI, SC .
NEUROSURGERY, 1992, 31 (05) :975-978
[7]
USING FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE PROFILES AS AN INDEX OF OUTCOME IN THE REHABILITATION OF BRAIN-INJURED PATIENTS [J].
COOK, L ;
SMITH, DS ;
TRUMAN, G .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1994, 75 (04) :390-393
[8]
INFLUENCE OF EARLY VARIABLES IN TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY ON FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE SCORES AND REHABILITATION LENGTH OF STAY AND CHARGES [J].
COWEN, TD ;
MEYTHALER, JM ;
DEVIVO, MJ ;
IVIE, CS ;
LEBOW, J ;
NOVACK, TA .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1995, 76 (09) :797-803
[9]
CURRENS JAB, UNPUB EVALUATION DIS
[10]
FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME IN CHILDREN WITH TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY - AGREEMENT BETWEEN CLINICAL JUDGMENT AND THE FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE [J].
DISCALA, C ;
GRANT, CC ;
BROOKE, MM ;
GANS, BM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 1992, 71 (03) :145-148