The Illusion of Will in Organizational Behavior Research: Nonconscious Processes and Job Design

被引:36
作者
George, Jennifer M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Rice Univ, Jesse H Jones Grad Sch Business, Houston, TX 77005 USA
[2] Rice Univ, Dept Psychol, Houston, TX 77005 USA
关键词
affect/emotions; information processing; job design; INDIVIDUAL CONSTRUCT ACCESSIBILITY; IMPLICIT MEASURES; TEIGE-MOCIGEMBA; WORK DESIGN; INFORMATION; CREATIVITY; ATTITUDES; CONTEXT; AUTOMATICITY; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1177/0149206309346337
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Theorizing and research in organizational behavior implicitly or explicitly assumes that behavior is the product of conscious will. However, an extensive body of literature suggests that much of human behavior is automatic and that nonconscious thoughts and feelings are primary drivers of reactions and behavior. Relying on propositions in use in job design theory and research as a critical case in point, the author reviews the literatures on automatic thought and nonconscious emotions and their implications. Based on these literatures, the author develops alternative propositions for job design theory and research that are based on more realistic assumptions about the mind and human functioning. In addition to discussing implications of nonconscious processes for job design, the author draws broader implications for the field of organizational behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:1318 / 1339
页数:22
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]  
Andersen S.M., 2007, SOC PSYCHOL-GERMANY, P138
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1981, Personality, cognition and social interaction
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, SOCIAL PSYCHOL HDB B
[4]  
Bargh J., 1997, ADV SOC COG, V10, P1
[5]  
BARGH J A, 1989, P3
[6]  
Bargh J.A., 2007, Social psychology and the unconscious: The automaticity of higher mental processes
[7]  
Bargh J. A., 1994, HDB SOCIAL COGNITION, P1
[8]  
Bargh J.A., 1990, Handbook of motivation and cognition, V2, P93
[9]  
Bargh JA, 1999, DUAL-PROCESS THEORIES IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, P361
[10]   The unbearable automaticity of being [J].
Bargh, JA ;
Chartrand, TL .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1999, 54 (07) :462-479