Airway management in cardiac arrest - comparison of the laryngeal tube, tracheal intubation and bag-valve mask ventilation in emergency medical training

被引:84
作者
Kurola, J
Harve, H
Kettunen, T
Laakso, JP
Gorski, J
Paakkonen, H
Silfvast, T
机构
[1] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, FIN-70210 Kuopio, Finland
[2] Helsinki Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesia & Intens Care Med, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland
[3] Emergency Serv Coll, FIN-70821 Kuopio, Finland
关键词
airway management; laryngeal tube; training; education; ventilation;
D O I
10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.01.014
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Tracheal intubation (ETI) is considered the method of choice for securing the airway and for providing effective ventilation during cardiac arrest. However, ETI requires skills which are difficult to maintain especially if practised infrequently. The laryngeal tube (LT) has been successfully tested and used in anaesthesia and in simulated cardiac arrest in manikins. To compare the initiation and success of ventilation with the LT, ETI and bag-valve mask (BVM) in a cardiac arrest scenario, 60 fire-fighter emergency medical technician (EMT) students formed teams of two rescuers at random and were allocated to use these devices. We found that the teams using the LT were able to initiate ventilation more rapidly than those performing ETI (P < 0.0001). The LT and ETI provided equal minute volumes of ventilation, which was significantly higher than that delivered with the BVM (P < 0.000 1). Our data suggest that the LT may enable airway control more rapidly and as effectively as ETI, and compared to BVM, may provide better minute ventilation when used by inexperienced personnel. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 153
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, RESUSCITATION, V46, P1
[2]   Use of the laryngeal tube during cardiopulmonary resuscitation by paramedical staff [J].
Asai, T ;
Moriyama, S ;
Nishita, Y ;
Kawachi, S .
ANAESTHESIA, 2003, 58 (04) :393-394
[3]   A new device has to be safe and reliable too - Reply [J].
Asai, T .
ANAESTHESIA, 2001, 56 (04) :382-383
[4]  
Brimacombe J, 2002, CAN J ANAESTH, V49, P1084, DOI 10.1007/BF03017908
[5]   A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway ProSealTM and the laryngeal tube airway in paralyzed anesthetized adult patients undergoing pressure-controlled ventilation [J].
Brimacombe, J ;
Keller, C ;
Brimacombe, L .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2002, 95 (03) :770-776
[6]   VENTILATION SKILLS OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL TECHNICIANS - A TEACHING CHALLENGE FOR EMERGENCY-MEDICINE [J].
CUMMINS, RO ;
AUSTIN, D ;
GRAVES, JR ;
LITWIN, PE ;
PIERCE, J .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1986, 15 (10) :1187-1192
[7]   Intubating laryngeal mask airway, laryngeal tube, 1100 ml self-inflating bag-alternatives for basic life support? [J].
Dörges, V ;
Wenzel, V ;
Schumann, T ;
Neubert, E ;
Ocker, H ;
Gerlach, K .
RESUSCITATION, 2001, 51 (02) :185-191
[8]  
Dörges V, 2000, ANESTH ANALG, V90, P1220
[9]   A comparison of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask and the Laryngeal Tube® in spontaneously breathing anesthetized patients [J].
Figueredo, E ;
Martínez, M ;
Pintanel, T .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2003, 96 (02) :600-605
[10]  
Genzwuerker H V, 2000, Prehosp Emerg Care, V4, P371, DOI 10.1080/10903120090941182