Abuse liability assessment of neuroprotectants

被引:17
作者
Klein, M [1 ]
Calderon, S [1 ]
Hayes, B [1 ]
机构
[1] US FDA, Ctr Drug Evaluat & Res, Div Anesthet Crit Care & Addict Drug Prod, Controlled Subst Evaluat Team, Rockville, MD 20857 USA
来源
NEUROPROTECTIVE AGENTS: FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE | 1999年 / 890卷
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08033.x
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
There has been considerable interest in the potential of N-methyl-D aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists in the treatment of a diverse group of neurological disorders including cerebral ischemia and neurodegeneration.(8,16,19) The amino acids L-glutamate and L-aspartate have been shown to possibly mediate excitatory synaptic transmission in the central nervous system (CNS) via selective excitatory amino acid receptors. Competitive and noncompetitive antagonists acting at the NMDA receptors have been shown to possess relevant activity. However, NMDA antagonists can produce a variety of adverse neurobehavioral effects in both animals and humans.(9-12,14,17,18) These adverse events are particularly pronounced with NMDA antagonists (phencyclidine (PCP), ketamine, and MK-801) that have dissociative anesthetic properties and block NMDA receptor-mediated responses by binding to the cation channel of the NMDA receptor complex, When a new pharmaceutical product demonstrates structural similarity and/or a similar pharmacological profile with a known drug of abuse, the characterization of its abuse potential is needed by the FDA for scientific review.(1,3,4,22) The abuse liability assessment is based upon an evaluation of data on the chemistry, pharmacology (preclinical and clinical), pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamic: profiles of the drug, and the adverse events/effects reported in clinical trials, The evaluation of the drug's abuse potential is determined relative to pharmacologically similar drugs. This includes determination of the drug's receptor binding efficacy, preclinical pharmacology, reinforcing efficacy, discriminative stimulus effects, dependence-producing potential, pharmacokinetics, and assessment of the clinical efficacy-safety database relative to abuse and clinical abuse liability studies.(2,7,9,13,20-22) It has been well established that high-affinity noncompetitive NMDA antagonists have reinforcing efficacy and can serve as discriminative stimuli in operant procedures. In a variety of species:in drug discrimination studies, each antagonist is capable of generalizing to the others, and it is believed that these effects may be mediated through the NMDA blockade, The generalization of each substance for another:suggests production of common subjective effects in humans.
引用
收藏
页码:515 / 525
页数:11
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
BALSTER RL, 1991, BRIT J ADDICT, V86, P1549
[2]  
BEARDSLEY PM, 1986, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V239, P311
[3]   REINFORCING AND SUBJECTIVE EFFECTS OF ORAL DELTA-9-THC AND SMOKED MARIJUANA IN HUMANS [J].
CHAIT, LD ;
ZACNY, JP .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1992, 107 (2-3) :255-262
[4]  
*CONTR SUBST ACT, 1996, DRUG AB PREV CONTR
[5]  
DOPPENBERG EMR, 1997, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V825, P305
[6]  
Farber NB, 1998, NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOL, V18, P57
[7]  
*FOOD DRUG ADM, 1990, M FDA DRUG ADV COMM
[8]   Dizocilpine-like discriminative stimulus effects of low-affinity uncompetitive NMDA antagonists [J].
Grant, KA ;
Colombo, G ;
Grant, J ;
Rogawski, MA .
NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 35 (12) :1709-1719
[9]   Cannabidiol and (-)Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol are neuroprotective antioxidants [J].
Hampson, AJ ;
Grimaldi, M ;
Axelrod, J ;
Wink, D .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1998, 95 (14) :8268-8273
[10]  
Javitt DC, 1997, NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOL, V17, P202