How firms collaborate with public research organizations: The evolution of proximity dimensions in successful innovation projects

被引:160
作者
Steinmo, Marianne [1 ]
Rasmussen, Einar [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nordland, Sch Business, Univ Alleen 11, N-8049 Bodo, Norway
关键词
Engineering-based firms; Innovation projects; Proximity dimensions; Public research organizations; Science-based firms; Universities; INDUSTRY COLLABORATIONS; STRATEGIC ALLIANCES; KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER; SECTORAL PATTERNS; UNIVERSITY; NETWORKS; TAXONOMY; CHANNELS; DISTANCE; SEARCH;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.09.006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
020101 [政治经济学];
摘要
Although public research organizations (PROs) are potentially valuable collaboration partners for firms in the development of innovations, most firms find it difficult to develop and sustain fruitful collaborations with PROs. Proximity dimensions, such as geographical, cognitive, organizational, and social proximity, are important facilitators of inter-organizational collaboration. Nevertheless, our understanding of the interaction between and evolution of different proximity dimensions over time is limited. Based on a longitudinal study of 15 successful innovation projects involving firms and PROs as collaboration partners, we find that different proximity dimensions are important for the establishment of new collaborations, depending on a firm's characteristics. While engineering-based firms tend to rely on geographical and social proximity to PROs, science-based firms rely more heavily on cognitive and organizational proximity. Moreover, we observe that firms with initial social and geographical proximity to PROs can sustain and expand their collaborations by developing cognitive and organizational proximity over time. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1250 / 1259
页数:10
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2000, LEARNING INNOVATION, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199241002.001.0001/ACPROF-9780199241002
[2]
[Anonymous], COMPANION ORG
[3]
Asheim B.T., 2005, The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, DOI DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199286805.003.0011
[4]
Face-to-face, buzz, and knowledge bases: sociospatial implications for learning, innovation, and innovation policy [J].
Asheim, Bjorn ;
Coenen, Lars ;
Vang, Jan .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2007, 25 (05) :655-670
[5]
Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters [J].
Asheim, BT ;
Coenen, L .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2005, 34 (08) :1173-1190
[6]
Audretsch DB, 1996, AM ECON REV, V86, P630
[8]
Proximity and Innovation: From Statics to Dynamics [J].
Balland, Pierre-Alexandre ;
Boschma, Ron ;
Frenken, Koen .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 2015, 49 (06) :907-920
[9]
Proximity and the Evolution of Collaboration Networks: Evidence from Research and Development Projects within the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Industry [J].
Balland, Pierre-Alexandre .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 2012, 46 (06) :741-756
[10]
Public research and industrial innovations in Germany [J].
Beise, M ;
Stahl, H .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1999, 28 (04) :397-422