Dialysis-based bioreactor systems for the production of monoclonal antibodies - alternatives to ascites production in mice

被引:31
作者
Bruce, MP [1 ]
Boyd, V [1 ]
Duch, C [1 ]
White, JR [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO, Livestock Ind, Geelong, Vic 3220, Australia
关键词
monoclonal antibody production; bioreactor; CELLine; miniPERM (TM); ascites tumour fluid; antibody concentration; purity;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-1759(02)00081-9
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Two commercially available bioreactor systems, CELLine and miniPERM(TM), were evaluated for their ability to support the production of monoclonal antibody (mAb) from a variety of murine hybridoma cell lines. Production and purity of mAbs were compared between the two systems and with mouse ascites tumour fluid generation, The quality and purity of the mAb generated by each method was analysed on SDS-PAGE gels and the antibody immunoreactivity in each case was quantified by indirect ELISA tests. The relative benefits of conventional growth medium (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's media, DMEM) and serum-free medium (hybridoma serum-free media, H-SFM) using the miniPERM(TM) system were also analysed, in terms of the amount of antibody produced, cell concentration and specific antibody titre. In all cases, the CELLine units tested gave higher protein concentrations compared to the miniPERM(TM) system under the same conditions (means and 95% confidence limits are 4.2 +/- 0.8 and 2.1 +/- 0.8 mg/ml, respectively), yet the miniPERM(TM) system yielded greater total amounts over a similar culture period (428.7 +/- 243.3 mg compared to 183.3 +/- 100.9 mg in the CL-350 CELLine unit). When defined by specific ELISA titre, both bioreactor systems yielded mAb levels that compared favourably with those derived from ascites, In addition, SDS-PAGE analysis indicated that the bioreactor antibody product was relatively free of contaminating protein, whereas ascites tumour fluid preparations displayed significant levels of extraneous protein. This study has shown that both bioreactor systems are acceptable in vitro alternatives to the in vivo production of mAbs in mice. Crown Copyright (C) 2002 Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 68
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
AMYX H, 1989, NEWS, V2, P3
[2]  
AMYX HL, 1987, J AM VET MED ASSOC, V191, P1287
[3]  
BIRCH JR, 1985, TRENDS BIOTECHNOL, V3, P162, DOI 10.1016/0167-7799(85)90115-5
[4]  
DONOHOE PJ, 1995, MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIE, P15
[5]  
EVANS TL, 1988, BIOTECHNIQUES, V6, P762
[6]   A SIMPLE AND INEXPENSIVE HIGH-DENSITY DIALYSIS TUBING CELL-CULTURE SYSTEM FOR THE IN-VITRO PRODUCTION OF MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODIES IN HIGH-CONCENTRATION [J].
FALKENBERG, FW ;
HENGELAGE, T ;
KRANE, M ;
BARTELS, I ;
ALBRECHT, A ;
HOLTMEIER, N ;
WUTHRICH, M .
JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS, 1993, 165 (02) :193-206
[7]   IN-VITRO PRODUCTION OF MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODIES IN HIGH-CONCENTRATION IN A NEW AND EASY TO HANDLE MODULAR MINIFERMENTER [J].
FALKENBERG, FW ;
WEICHERT, H ;
KRANE, M ;
BARTELS, I ;
PALME, M ;
NAGELS, HO ;
FIEBIG, H .
JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS, 1995, 179 (01) :13-29
[8]  
FERGUSON J, 1993, AUST SOC LAB ANI WIN, P1
[9]  
FERGUSON J, 1991, AUST COUNC CARE ANIM, V4, P5
[10]   Production of monoclonal antibodies by the ascites method in laboratory animals [J].
Hendriksen, CFM ;
de Leeuw, W .
RESEARCH IN IMMUNOLOGY, 1998, 149 (06) :535-542