Effect of preoperative treatment strategies on the outcome of patients with clinical T3, non-metastasized rectal cancer: A comparison between Dutch and Canadian expert centers

被引:8
作者
Breugom, A. J. [1 ]
Vermeer, T. A. [2 ]
van den Broek, C. B. M. [1 ]
Vuong, T. [3 ]
Bastiaannet, E. [1 ,4 ]
Azoulay, L. [5 ,6 ]
Dekkers, O. M. [7 ]
Niazi, T. [3 ]
van den Berg, H. A. [8 ]
Rutten, H. J. T. [2 ]
van de Velde, C. J. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Catharina Hosp, Dept Surg, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[3] McGill Univ, Jewish Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Montreal, PQ H3T 1E2, Canada
[4] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Gerontol & Geriatr, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
[5] Lady Davis Inst, Ctr Clin Epidemiol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[6] McGill Univ, Dept Oncol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[7] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
[8] Catharina Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, Eindhoven, Netherlands
来源
EJSO | 2015年 / 41卷 / 08期
关键词
Rectal cancer; External beam radiotherapy; High-dose-rate brachytherapy; The Netherlands; Canada; Outcome; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; PATHOLOGICAL COMPLETE RESPONSE; RATE ENDORECTAL BRACHYTHERAPY; MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER; FOLLOW-UP; NEOADJUVANT TREATMENT; IRRADIATED PATIENTS; 2ND MALIGNANCIES; RISK-FACTORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2015.05.002
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Aim: High-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) appears to be associated with less treatment-related toxicity compared with external beam radiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer. The present study compared the effect of preoperative treatment strategies on overall survival, cancer-specific deaths, and local recurrences between a Dutch and Canadian expert center with different preoperative treatment strategies. Patients and methods: We included 145 Dutch and 141 Canadian patients with cT3, non-metastasized rectal cancer. All patients from Canada were preoperatively treated with HDRBT. The preoperative treatment strategy for Dutch patients consisted of either no preoperative treatment, short-course radiotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing overall survival. We adjusted for age, cN stage, (y)pT stage, comorbidity, and type of surgery. Primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary end-points were cancer-specific deaths and local recurrences. Results: Five-year overall survival was 70.9% (95% CI 62.6%-77.7%) in Dutch patients compared with 86.9% (80.1%-91.6%) in Canadian patients, resulting in an adjusted HR of 0.70 (95% CI 0.39-1.26; p = 0.233). Of 145 Dutch patients, 6.9% (95% CI 2.8%-11.0%) had a local recurrence and 17.9% (95% CI 11.7%-24.2%) patients died of rectal cancer, compared with 4.3% (95% CI 0.9%-7.5%) local recurrences and 10.6% (95% CI 5.5%-15.7%) rectal cancer deaths out of 141 Canadian patients. Conclusion: We did not detect statistically significant differences in overall survival between a Dutch and Canadian expert center with different treatment strategies. This finding needs to be further investigated in a randomized controlled trial. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1039 / 1044
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2001, LANCET, V358
[2]
THE RATE OF SECONDARY MALIGNANCIES AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY VERSUS EXTERNAL BEAM RADIATION THERAPY FOR LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER: A POPULATION-BASED STUDY ON 17,845 PATIENTS [J].
Bhojani, Naeem ;
Capitanio, Umberto ;
Suardi, Nazareno ;
Jeldres, Claudio ;
Isbarn, Hendrik ;
Shariat, Shahrokh F. ;
Graefen, Markus ;
Arjane, Philippe ;
Duclos, Alain ;
Lattouf, Jean-Baptiste ;
Saad, Fred ;
Valiquette, Luc ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Perrotte, Paul ;
Karakiewicz, Pierre I. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 76 (02) :342-348
[3]
Rectal cancer: Local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT, and MR imaging - A meta-analysis [J].
Bipat, S ;
Glas, AS ;
Slors, FJM ;
Zwinderman, AH ;
Bossuyt, PMM ;
Stoker, J .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 232 (03) :773-783
[4]
Brenner DJ, 2000, CANCER, V88, P398, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000115)88:2<398::AID-CNCR22>3.0.CO
[5]
2-V
[6]
Instrumental variable methods in comparative safety and effectiveness research [J].
Brookhart, M. Alan ;
Rassen, Jeremy A. ;
Schneeweiss, Sebastian .
PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2010, 19 (06) :537-554
[7]
Preoperative radiotherapy for resectable rectal cancer -: A meta-analysis [J].
Cammà, C ;
Giunta, M ;
Fiorica, F ;
Pagliaro, L ;
Craxì, A ;
Cottone, M .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 284 (08) :1008-1015
[8]
Image-guided high dose rate endorectal brachytherapy [J].
Devic, Slobodan ;
Vuong, Te ;
Moftah, Belal ;
Evans, Michael ;
Podgorsak, Ervin B. ;
Poon, Emily ;
Verhaegen, Frank .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (11) :4451-4458
[9]
Advantages of inflatable multichannel endorectal applicator in the neo-adjuvant treatment of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer with HDR brachytherapy [J].
Devic, Slobodan ;
Vuong, Te ;
Moftah, Belal .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 6 (02) :44-49
[10]
Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012 [J].
Ferlay, Jacques ;
Soerjomataram, Isabelle ;
Dikshit, Rajesh ;
Eser, Sultan ;
Mathers, Colin ;
Rebelo, Marise ;
Parkin, Donald Maxwell ;
Forman, David ;
Bray, Freddie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 136 (05) :E359-E386