Increasing transparency in partnerships for health - introducing the Green Light Committee

被引:93
作者
Gupta, R
Cegielski, JP
Espinal, MA
Henkens, M
Kim, JY
Lambregts-van Weezenbeek, CSB
Lee, JW
Raviglione, MC
Suarez, PG
Varaine, F
机构
[1] WHO, CDS, STB, TBS, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Programme Infect Dis & Social Change, Boston, MA USA
[3] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Int Act Branch, Atlanta, GA USA
[4] Med Sans Frontieres, Int Off, Brussels, Belgium
[5] Royal Netherlands TB Assoc, The Hague, Netherlands
[6] Minist Salud, Programa Control TB, Lima, Peru
[7] Med Sans Frontieres, Paris, France
关键词
MDR-TB; partnerships; access to drugs; tuberculosis;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-3156.2002.00960.x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 [公共卫生与预防医学]; 120402 [社会医学与卫生事业管理];
摘要
Public-private partnerships have become central to efforts to combat infectious diseases. The characteristics of specific partnerships, their governance structures, and their ability to effectively address the issues for which they are developed are being clarified as experience is gained. In an attempt to promote access to and rational use of second-line anti-tuberculosis (TB) drugs for the treatment of multidrug-resistant TB, a unique partnership known as the Green Light Committee (GLC) was established by the World Health Organization. This partnership relies on five categories of actors to achieve its goal: academic institutions, civil society organizations, bilateral donors, governments of resource-limited countries, and a specialized United Nations agency. While the for-profit private sector is involved in terms of supplying concessionally priced drugs it is excluded from decision-making. The effectiveness of the partnership emerges from its review process, flexibility to modify its modus operandi to overcome obstacles, independence from the commercial sector, and its ability to link access, rational use, technical assistance, and policy development. The GLC mechanism may be useful in the development of other partnerships needed in the rational allocation of resources and tools for combating additional infectious diseases.
引用
收藏
页码:970 / 976
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2002, LONG WAY GO CRITIQUE
[2]
BIRMINGHAM K, 2000, NAT MED, V5, P481
[3]
GAVI, the first steps: lessons for the Global Fund [J].
Brugha, R ;
Starling, M ;
Walt, G .
LANCET, 2002, 359 (9304) :435-438
[4]
A global health fund: a leap of faith? [J].
Brugha, R ;
Walt, G .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7305) :152-154
[5]
BRUNDTLAND GH, 2001, STOP TB PARTNERS FOR
[6]
BRUNDTLAND GH, 2001, AM PUBL HLTH ASS ANN
[7]
Buse K, 2000, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V78, P699
[8]
Buse K, 2000, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V78, P549
[9]
Buse K, 2001, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V79, P748
[10]
Drug-resistant tuberculosis: desperate measures? [J].
Cullinan, T .
LANCET, 2001, 357 (9262) :1124-1124