Evidence-based practice in psychology

被引:1454
作者
Goodheart C.D.
Levant R.F. [1 ]
Barlow D.H. [2 ]
Carter J.
Davidson K.W. [3 ]
Hagglund K.J. [4 ]
Hollon S.D. [5 ]
Johnson J.D.
Leviton L.C. [6 ]
Mahrer A.R. [7 ]
Newman F.L. [8 ]
Norcross J.C. [9 ]
Silverman D.K. [10 ]
Smedley B.D. [11 ]
Wampold B.E. [12 ]
Westen D.I. [13 ]
Yates B.T. [14 ]
Zane N.W. [15 ,16 ]
Reed G.M. [17 ]
Bufka L.F. [17 ]
Nelson P.D. [18 ]
Belar C.D. [18 ]
Bullock M. [19 ]
机构
[1] University of Missouri, Columbia
[2] Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Princeton, NJ
[3] Opportunity Agenda, Washington, DC
[4] University of California, Davis
关键词
evidence-based practice; best available research evidence; clinical expertise; patient characteristics; culture; and preferences;
D O I
10.1037/0003-066X.61.4.271
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The evidence-based practice movement has become an important feature of health care systems and health care policy. Within this context, the APA 2005 Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice defines and discusses evidence-based practice in psychology (EBPP). In an integration of science and practice, the Task Force's report describes psychology's fundamental commitment to sophisticated EBPP and takes into account the full range of evidence psychologists and policymakers must consider. Research, clinical expertise, and patient characteristics are all supported as relevant to good outcomes. EBPP promotes effective psychological practice and enhances public health by applying empirically supported principles of psychological assessment, case formulation, therapeutic relationship, and intervention. The report provides a rationale for and expanded discussion of the EBPP policy statement that was developed by the Task Force and adopted as association policy by the APA Council of Representatives in August 2005.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 285
页数:15
相关论文
共 117 条