Measuring product development performance in manufacturing organisations

被引:61
作者
Driva, H
Pawar, KS
Menon, U
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Div Mfg Engn & Operat Management, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[2] Calif Polytech State Univ San Luis Obispo, IME Dept, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 USA
关键词
product development; design; methodology; NPD; performance measurement survey;
D O I
10.1016/S0925-5273(99)00007-9
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Effectively managing and measuring the product development process is widely seen as a means of ensuring business survival through reduced time to market, increased quality and reduced costs. Research carried out at the University of Nottingham over the last three years has led to the development of the performance measurement for product development (PMPD) methodology to guide managers in the use of performance measures to improve decision-making during the product development process. This paper focuses on the results from two international surveys of academics and industrialists that indicate current practice and future intentions in this area. Follow up cases and a longitudinal case study are also described. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 159
页数:13
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], THESIS U NOTTINGHAM
[2]  
[Anonymous], P 1 INT EUROMA C
[3]  
[Anonymous], DESIGN MANAGEMENT J
[4]  
[Anonymous], MEASURING PERFORMANC
[5]   NEW PRODUCT STRATEGY, STRUCTURE, PROCESS, AND PERFORMANCE IN THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY [J].
BARCZAK, G .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 1995, 12 (03) :224-234
[6]  
DRIVA H, 1997, P 2 EUR PACE WORKSH, P10
[7]   ISSUES IN DEVELOPING A PERFORMANCE CRITERIA SYSTEM FOR AN ORGANIZATION [J].
GLOBERSON, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 1985, 23 (04) :639-646
[8]   INTEGRATED PERFORMANCE-MEASUREMENT - A REVIEW OF CURRENT PRACTICE AND EMERGING TRENDS [J].
GREGORY, MJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 1993, 30-1 :281-296
[9]   PDMA success measurement project: Recommended measures for product development success and failure [J].
Griffin, A ;
Page, AL .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 1996, 13 (06) :478-496
[10]  
Gupta AK, 1996, J PROD INNOVAT MANAG, V13, P497, DOI 10.1016/S0737-6782(96)00051-3