The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty

被引:626
作者
Kaan, E
Harris, A
Gibson, E
Holcomb, P
机构
[1] Utrecht Inst Linguist OTS, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[3] MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[4] Tufts Univ, Medford, MA 02155 USA
来源
LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES | 2000年 / 15卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1080/016909600386084
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
The P600 component in Event Related Potential research has been hypothesised to be associated with syntactic reanalysis processes. We, however, propose that the P600 is not restricted to reanalysis processes, but reflects difficulty with syntactic integration processes in general. First we discuss this integration hypothesis in terms of a sentence processing model proposed elsewhere. Next, in Experiment 1, we show that the P600 is elicited in grammatical, non-garden path sentences in which integration is more difficult (i.e., "who" questions) relative to a control sentence ("whether" questions). This effect is replicated in Experiment 2. Furthermore, we directly compare the effect of difficult integration in grammatical sentences to the effect of agreement violations. The results suggest that the positivity elicited in "who" questions and the P600-effect elicited by agreement violations have partly overlapping neural generators. This supports the hypothesis that similar cognitive processes, i.e., integration, are involved in both first pass analysis of "who" questions and dealing with ungrammaticalities (reanalysis).
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 201
页数:43
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Dissociating brain responses to syntactic and semantic anomalies: Evidence from event-related potentials [J].
Ainsworth-Darnell, K ;
Shulman, HG ;
Boland, JE .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1998, 38 (01) :112-130
[2]   INTERACTION WITH CONTEXT DURING HUMAN SENTENCE PROCESSING [J].
ALTMANN, G ;
STEEDMAN, M .
COGNITION, 1988, 30 (03) :191-238
[3]  
[Anonymous], REANALYSIS SENTENCE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1985, NATURAL LANGUAGE PAR, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511597855
[5]   Verb argument structure in parsing and interpretation: Evidence from wh-questions [J].
Boland, JE ;
Tanenhaus, MK ;
Garnsey, SM ;
Carlson, GN .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1995, 34 (06) :774-806
[6]   EVIDENCE FOR THE IMMEDIATE USE OF VERB CONTROL INFORMATION IN SENTENCE PROCESSING [J].
BOLAND, JE ;
TANENHAUS, MK ;
GARNSEY, SM .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1990, 29 (04) :413-432
[7]  
CANSECOGONZALEZ E, 1997, 4 ANN M COGN NEUR SO
[8]  
CINQUE G, 1992, TYPES DEPENDENCIES
[9]   Expect the unexpected: Event-related brain response to morphosyntactic violations [J].
Coulson, S ;
King, JW ;
Kutas, M .
LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 1998, 13 (01) :21-58
[10]  
DeVincenzi M., 1991, Syntactic Parsing Strategies in Italian