Crack coalescence in specimens with open and closed flaws: A comparison

被引:457
作者
Park, C. H. [2 ]
Bobet, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Sch Civil Engn, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Lachel Felice & Associates, Columbus, OH USA
关键词
Crack initiation; Coalescence; Frictional discontinuity; Multiple flaws; FRACTURE COALESCENCE; BIAXIAL COMPRESSION; BRITTLE-FRACTURE; MODE-II; ROCK; INITIATION; MARBLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrmms.2009.02.006
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
A comparison is presented between experimental observations made from gypsum specimens loaded in uniaxial compression, with open and closed flaws. Three types of cracks are observed: wing cracks, coplanar and oblique secondary cracks. Wing cracks are tensile cracks that initiate at or near the tip of the flaws, are stable, and propagate towards the direction of maximum compression. Secondary cracks are shear cracks; they are initially stable and may become unstable near coalescence. Coalescence is produced by the linkage of two flaws by a combination of wing and secondary cracks. When coalescence occurs through wing cracks or a combination of wing and secondary cracks, the process is stable. When coalescence occurs through secondary cracks only, the phenomenon is unstable. Eight types of coalescence have been identified, which apply to specimens with open and closed flaws. The types of coalescence are classified based on the types of cracks that produce linkage, and are closely related to the orientation, spacing, and continuity of the flaws. Interestingly, coalescence produced through the linkage of shear cracks only occurs a thigher stress than coalescence produced by a combination of shear and wing cracks. The smallest coalescence stress occurs when produced only by wing cracks. The main difference between experimental results from open and closed flaws is that initiation stresses and coalescence are higher for closed than for open flaws. This is explained by the friction along the closed flaws, which needs to be overcome before a crack can initiate, and also by the capability of closed flaws to transmit normal stresses. Thus the differences are not fundamental, and so a unified conceptual framework and a common terminology are proposed for fracturing phenomena in brittle materials with open or with frictional pre-existing discontinuities. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:819 / 829
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], P 7 INT C ROCK MECH
[2]   Rock fracture toughness testing in Mode II - punch-through shear test [J].
Backers, T ;
Stephansson, O ;
Rybacki, E .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2002, 39 (06) :755-769
[3]   Fracture coalescence in rock-type materials under uniaxial and biaxial compression [J].
Bobet, A ;
Einstein, HH .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 1998, 35 (07) :863-888
[4]   The initiation of secondary cracks in compression [J].
Bobet, A .
ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2000, 66 (02) :187-219
[5]  
Bobet A., 1997, Sc.D, Thesis
[6]  
Chen G, 1992, S FRACT JOINT ROCK M, P443
[7]   MECHANISMS OF BRITTLE-FRACTURE OF ROCK WITH PREEXISTING CRACKS IN COMPRESSION [J].
GERMANOVICH, LN ;
SALGANIK, RL ;
DYSKIN, AV ;
LEE, KK .
PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 1994, 143 (1-3) :117-149
[8]  
HORRI H, 1986, PHILOS T ROY SOC LON, V319, P337
[9]   AN EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY OF THE STRAIN FIELD DEVELOPMENT PRIOR TO FAILURE OF A MARBLE PLATE UNDER COMPRESSION [J].
HUANG, JF ;
CHEN, GG ;
ZHAO, YH ;
WANG, R .
TECTONOPHYSICS, 1990, 175 (1-3) :269-284
[10]   FINITE-ELEMENT MODELS FOR ROCK FRACTURE-MECHANICS [J].
INGRAFFEA, AR ;
HEUZE, FE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL AND ANALYTICAL METHODS IN GEOMECHANICS, 1980, 4 (01) :25-43