Modeling remission and relapse in pediatric epilepsy: application of a Markov process

被引:39
作者
Berg, AT [1 ]
Lin, JX
Ebrahimi, N
Testa, FM
Levy, SR
Shinnar, S
机构
[1] No Illinois Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Neuroepidemiol Grp, De Kalb, IL 60115 USA
[2] Div Stat, De Kalb, IL USA
[3] Yale Univ, Dept Pediat, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[4] Yale Univ, Dept Neurol, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[5] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Montefiore Med & Comprehens Epilepsy Management C, Dept Neurol, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[6] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Montefiore Med & Comprehens Epilepsy Management C, Dept Pediat, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
关键词
remission; relapse; (long-term) prognosis; epilepsy syndromes; Markov process;
D O I
10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2004.05.002
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Seizure outcome is frequently described in terms of patients ever attaining remission or being in terminal remission. Outcomes are more complicated and, over many years, repeated remission and relapses may occur. These are difficult to quantify with standard survival techniques used in analysis of remission and relapse. The Markov process, which allows one to track a patient's state (remission or not) over time, provides a suitable approach for studying repeated remission and relapse. In a prospective community-based study of children followed from the point of the initial diagnosis of epilepsy, we examined the probability of repeated remission and relapse over up to three different remission episodes (minimum 1 year each) per patient. The role of epilepsy syndrome was the main determinant of remission-relapse patterns considered in the analysis. Two different Markov models were used, one involving three states and the other seven states. Of 613 children initially recruited into the study, 602 were followed at least 1 year and thus eligible for the analysis. Almost 90% of the cohort experienced a remission; however, almost half then relapsed. Second remissions occurred in 81% of those who relapsed of whom 38% relapsed again. A third remission occurred in 82% of those after a second relapse of whom 58% relapsed yet again. After the first 2 years, similar to70% of the cohort was in remission, 20% was no longer in remission having relapsed, and 10% had never been in remission. Significant differences were seen by underlying epilepsy syndrome. Children with one of the epileptic encephalopathies were least likely of all syndrome groups ever to remit. Those with symptomatic partial epilepsies were less likely to remit than children with any of the other syndromes, idiopathic partial or generalized, cryptogenic partial, and unclassified. Differences between these last groups became apparent when considering their subsequent remission and relapse histories. These differences were best seen in the seven-state model. For example, idiopathic partial epilepsies were most likely to enter remission and never relapse. By contrast, idiopathic generalized and cryptogenic partial epilepsies were more likely to remit and relapse repeatedly. The Markov approach provides an alternative to standard survival techniques for understanding remission and relapse outcomes in epilepsy. Its advantage is that it allows one to track the individuals' outcome over time even as the condition fluctuates. The technique would also be applicable in virtually any remitting-relapsing disorder. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 40
页数:10
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
AALEN OO, 1978, SCAND J STAT, V5, P141
[2]  
Andersen P. K., 2012, Statistical models based on counting processes
[3]   REMISSION OF SEIZURES AND RELAPSE IN PATIENTS WITH EPILEPSY [J].
ANNEGERS, JF ;
HAUSER, WA ;
ELVEBACK, LR .
EPILEPSIA, 1979, 20 (06) :729-737
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1993, EPILEPSIA, V34, P592
[5]   PROPOSAL FOR REVISED CLASSIFICATION OF EPILEPSIES AND EPILEPTIC SYNDROMES [J].
不详 .
EPILEPSIA, 1989, 30 (04) :389-399
[6]   How well can epilepsy syndromes be identified at diagnosis? A reassessment 2 years after initial diagnosis [J].
Berg, AT ;
Shinnar, S ;
Levy, SR ;
Testa, FM ;
Smith-Rapaport, S ;
Beckerman, B .
EPILEPSIA, 2000, 41 (10) :1269-1275
[7]   Newly diagnosed epilepsy in children: Presentation at diagnosis [J].
Berg, AT ;
Shinnar, S ;
Levy, SR ;
Testa, FM .
EPILEPSIA, 1999, 40 (04) :445-452
[8]   Two-year remission and subsequent relapse in children with newly diagnosed epilepsy [J].
Berg, AT ;
Shinnar, S ;
Levy, SR ;
Testa, FM ;
Smith-Rapaport, S ;
Beckerman, B ;
Ebrahimi, N .
EPILEPSIA, 2001, 42 (12) :1553-1562
[9]   Familial occurrence of epilepsy in children with newly diagnosed multiple seizures: Dutch study of epilepsy in childhood [J].
Callenbach, PMC ;
Geerts, AT ;
Arts, WFM ;
van Donselaar, CA ;
Peters, ACB ;
Stroink, H ;
Brouwer, OF .
EPILEPSIA, 1998, 39 (03) :331-336
[10]   Does the number of seizures before treatment influence ease of control or remission of childhood epilepsy? Not if the number is 10 or less [J].
Camfield, C ;
Camfield, P ;
Gordon, K ;
Dooley, J .
NEUROLOGY, 1996, 46 (01) :41-44