What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? No single outcome measure is satisfactory when evaluating success in assisted reproduction; both twin births and singleton births should be counted as successes

被引:45
作者
Dickey, RP
Sartor, BM
Pyrzak, R
机构
[1] Fertil Inst New Orleans, New Orleans, LA 70128 USA
[2] Louisiana State Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sect Reprod Endocrinol, New Orleans, LA USA
关键词
assisted reproductive technology; in vitro fertilization; outcome measures; twin births; singleton births;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/deh181
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The 2002 recommendation of the consensus meeting of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) that the outcome measure of assisted reproductive technology (ART) and non-ART should be 'singleton live birth rate' could profoundly effect the ability of infertility patients to become pregnant. We reviewed published reports and new data concerning elective single embryo transfer (eSET) vs. double embryo transfer (DET) and the outcome of twin pregnancies in the United States, as well as recommendations of other Societies concerning number of embryos to transfer and methods used to measure ART success. We found that no single outcome measure of ART is ideal. Mandatory eSET would result in 42%-70% fewer births compared to DET. Infertility treatments account for only 12% of all twin pregnancies and 4% of all premature births in the United States. Twin and singleton births due to ART do not occur earlier than spontaneously conceived twins and singletons unless they started as triplet and higher order pregnancies. Multiple outcome measures are necessary when evaluating ART success. Twin as well as singleton births should be counted as ART successes. The essential aim of infertility treatment should be a healthy low order (singleton or twin) birth.
引用
收藏
页码:783 / 787
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
*ASRD, 1999, GUID NUM EMBR TRANSF
[2]   Predictors of poor ovarian response in in vitro fertilization: a prospective study comparing basal markers of ovarian reserve [J].
Bancsi, LFJMM ;
Broekmans, FJM ;
Eijkemans, MJC ;
de Jong, FH ;
Habbema, JDF ;
te Velde, ER .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2002, 77 (02) :328-336
[3]   Risk for one or two very low birth weight twins: A population study [J].
Blickstein, I ;
Goldman, D ;
Mazkereth, R .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 96 (03) :400-402
[4]  
Blickstein I, 2003, J REPROD MED, V48, P335
[5]  
*CDCP, 2003, ASS REPR TECHN SUCC
[6]  
Coetsier T, 2001, HUM REPROD, V16, P790
[7]   Spontaneous reduction of multiple pregnancy: Incidence and effect on outcome [J].
Dickey, RP ;
Taylor, SN ;
Lu, PY ;
Sartor, BM ;
Storment, JM ;
Rye, PH ;
Pelletier, WD ;
Zender, JL ;
Matulich, EM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 186 (01) :77-83
[8]   Prediction of survival for preterm births by weight and gestational age: restrospective population based study [J].
Draper, ES ;
Manktelow, B ;
Field, DJ ;
James, D .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 319 (7217) :1093-1097
[9]   Basal antral follicle number and mean ovarian diameter predict cycle cancellation and ovarian responsiveness in assisted reproductive technology cycles [J].
Frattarelli, JL ;
Lauria-Costa, DF ;
Miller, BT ;
Bergh, PA ;
Scott, RT .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2000, 74 (03) :512-517
[10]   THE ORIGIN AND OUTCOME OF PRETERM TWIN PREGNANCIES [J].
GARDNER, MO ;
GOLDENBERG, RL ;
CLIVER, SP ;
TUCKER, JM ;
NELSON, KG ;
COPPER, RL .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 85 (04) :553-557