Elementary teachers' classroom assessment and grading practices

被引:123
作者
McMillan, JH [1 ]
Myran, S [1 ]
Workman, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Educ Studies, Richmond, VA 23284 USA
关键词
classroom assessment; elementary teachers; grading practices;
D O I
10.1080/00220670209596593
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The authors investigated the assessment and grading practices of over 900 Grades 3-5 teachers representing urban, suburban, and rural schools. Teachers indicated the extent to which they used various factors to grade students, the types of assessments used, the cognitive level of assessments, and the grades awarded. Teachers appeared to conceptualize 6 major factors when they graded students; they placed the greatest weight on academic performance and academic-enabling behaviors, such as effort and improvement, and much less emphasis on homework, comparisons with other students, grade distributions of other teachers, and borderline cases. The teachers used 3 types of assessments-constructed-response, objective, and teacher-made major examinations; they differentiated between recall and higher level cognitive skills. However, there were few relationships between assessment and grade level, subject matter assessed, and grades awarded. Results are discussed in light of other research, indicating that teachers use a "hodgepodge" of factors when assessing and grading students.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 213
页数:11
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
AIRASIAN PW, 1984, C CLASSR ASS KEY ED
[2]  
*AM FED TEACH NAT, 1990, STAND TEACH COMP ED
[3]  
[Anonymous], TEACHER TRAINING MEA
[4]  
Brookhart S.M., 1991, Educational Measurement, V10, P35, DOI [10.1111/j.1745-3992.1991.tb00182.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1745-3992.1991.TB00182.X]
[5]  
Brookhart S.M., 1994, APPL MEAS EDUC, V7, P279, DOI [DOI 10.1207/S15324818AME0704_2, 10.1207/s15324818ame0704_2]
[6]   A theoretical framework for the role of classroom assessment in motivating student effort and achievement [J].
Brookhart, SM .
APPLIED MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION, 1997, 10 (02) :161-180
[7]   TEACHERS GRADING PRACTICES - MEANING AND VALUES [J].
BROOKHART, SM .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 1993, 30 (02) :123-142
[8]  
CAULEY KM, 2000, ANN M AM ED RES ASS
[9]  
Cizek G., 1995, Educational Assessment, V3, P159, DOI 10.1207/s15326977ea0302_3
[10]  
Cross L. H., 1996, ANN M NAT COUNC MEAS