Validation of the EUROP system for lamb classification in Norway; repeatability and accuracy of visual assessment and prediction of lamb carcass composition

被引:53
作者
Johansen, Jorgen
Aastveit, Are H.
Egelandsdal, Bjorg
Kvaal, Knut
Roe, Morten
机构
[1] Norwegian Meat Res Ctr, N-0513 Oslo, Norway
[2] Norwegian Life Sci, Dept Chem Biotechnol & Food Sci, N-1432 As, Norway
[3] Norwegian Life Sci, Dept Math Sci & Technol, N-1432 As, Norway
关键词
lamb; carcass; classification; subjective assessment; commercial cutting;
D O I
10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.04.017
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 [食品科学与工程];
摘要
The EUROP classification system is based on visual assessment of carcass conformation and fatness. The first objective was to test the EUROP classification repeatability and accuracy of the national senior assessors of the system in Norway. The second objective was to test the accuracy of the trained and certified abattoir EUROP classifiers in Norway relative to EU Commission's supervising assessors. The third and final objective was to test the accuracy of the EUROP classification system, as assessed by the National senior assessors, for prediction of lean meat, fat and bone percentage and lean meat in relation to bone ratio. The results showed that the repeatability and accuracy of the national senior assessors was good, achieving high correlations both for conformation and fatness. For the abattoir assessors, there were some systematic differences compared to EU Commission's assessors, but these differences were within limits accepted by EU Commission. The relationship between abattoir and national senior assessors was good, with only small systematic differences. This may suggest that there also is a systematic difference between the national senior assessors of the system and EU Commission's assessors. The EUROP system predicted lean meat percentage poorly (R-2 = 0.407), with a prediction error for 3.027% lean. For fat and bone percentage, the results showed a fairly good prediction of fat percentage, but poorer for bone percentage, R-2 = 0.796 and R-2 = 0.450, respectively. The prediction error for fat and bone percentage was 2.300% and 2.125%, respectively. Lean: bone ratio was predicted poorly (R-2 = 0.212), with a prediction error of 0.363 lean: bone ratio. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 509
页数:13
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[2]
[Anonymous], 49 ICOMST
[3]
Berg EP, 1997, J ANIM SCI, V75, P2433
[4]
Coopman F, 2004, VLAAMS DIERGEN TIJDS, V73, P170
[5]
Recent developments in the applications of image processing techniques for food quality evaluation [J].
Du, CJ ;
Sun, DW .
TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 15 (05) :230-249
[6]
Fisher A. V., 1990, Reducing fat in meat animals., P255
[7]
EVALUATION OF THE HENNESSY GRADING PROBE TO PREDICT YIELDS OF LAMB CARCASSES FABRICATED TO MULTIPLE END-POINTS [J].
GARRETT, RP ;
EDWARDS, JW ;
SAVELL, JW ;
TATUM, JD .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1992, 70 (04) :1146-1152
[8]
A PROBE TO MEASURE GR IN LAMB CARCASSES AT CHAIN SPEED [J].
HOPKINS, DL ;
ANDERSON, MA ;
MORGAN, JE ;
HALL, DG .
MEAT SCIENCE, 1995, 39 (02) :159-165
[9]
THE ESTIMATION OF SHEEP CARCASS COMPOSITION FROM FAT AND MUSCLE THICKNESS MEASUREMENTS TAKEN BY PROBES [J].
KEMPSTER, AJ ;
CHADWICK, JP ;
CUE, RI ;
GRANTLEYSMITH, M .
MEAT SCIENCE, 1986, 16 (02) :113-126
[10]
Methods of predicting lamb carcass composition: A review [J].
Stanford, K ;
Jones, SDM ;
Price, MA .
SMALL RUMINANT RESEARCH, 1998, 29 (03) :241-254