Value of Strong Ties to Disconnected Others: Examining Knowledge Creation in Biomedicine

被引:217
作者
McFadyen, M. Ann [1 ]
Semadeni, Matthew [2 ]
Cannella, Albert A., Jr. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Arlington, Coll Business Adm, Dept Management, Arlington, TX 76010 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Kelley Sch Business, Dept Management, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[3] Tulane Univ, AB Freeman Sch Business, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
关键词
knowledge creation; exchange networks; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; DYNAMIC THEORY; WEAK TIES; NETWORKS; INNOVATION; ORGANIZATIONS; STRENGTH; PRODUCTIVITY; EMBEDDEDNESS; CAPABILITIES;
D O I
10.1287/orsc.1080.0388
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Knowledge creation requires the combination and exchange of diverse and overlapping knowledge inputs as individuals interact with exchange partners to create new knowledge. In this study, we examine knowledge creation among university research scientists as a function of their professional (ego) networks-those others with whom they collaborate for the purpose of creating new knowledge. We propose that knowledge creation relies, in part, on two attributes of a researcher's professional network structure-average tie strength and ego network density-and we provide insights into how these attributes jointly affect knowledge creation. Our study of over 7,300 scientific publications by 177 research scientists working with more than 14,000 others over an 11-year period provides evidence that the relationship between a research scientist's professional network and knowledge creation depends on both ego network density and average tie strength. Our evidence suggests that both attributes affect knowledge creation. Moreover, average tie strength interacts with density to affect knowledge creation such that researchers who maintain mostly strong ties with research collaborators who themselves comprise a sparse network have the highest levels of new knowledge creation.
引用
收藏
页码:552 / 564
页数:13
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]   Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study [J].
Ahuja, G .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2000, 45 (03) :425-455
[2]  
Allen T.J., 2007, The Organization and Architecture of Innovation
[3]  
AMABILE TM, 1988, RES ORGAN BEHAV, V10, P123
[4]   DEMOGRAPHY AND DESIGN - PREDICTORS OF NEW PRODUCT TEAM PERFORMANCE [J].
ANCONA, DG ;
CALDWELL, DF .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 1992, 3 (03) :321-341
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Knowledge emergence: Social, technical and evolutionary dimensions of knowledge creation
[6]   Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes [J].
Argote, L ;
McEvily, B ;
Reagans, R .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2003, 49 (04) :571-582
[7]   THE ECONOMIC-IMPLICATIONS OF LEARNING BY DOING [J].
ARROW, KJ .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1962, 29 (80) :155-173
[8]  
Baltagi B.H., 2001, Econometrics Analysis of Panel Data, V2nd
[9]  
BIAN Y, 2003, AM SOCIOL REV, V62, P366
[10]  
BOISSEVAIN Jeremy., 1974, Friends of Friends: Networks, Manipulators and Coalitions