Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Arcobacter butzleri and Arcobacter cryaerophilus strains isolated from humans and broilers

被引:38
作者
Houf, K
Devriese, LA
Haesebrouck, F
Vandenberg, O
Butzler, JP
Van Hoof, J
Vandamme, P
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Vet Publ Hlth, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Fac Vet Med, Dept Pathol Bacteriol & Poultry Dis, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
[3] Free Univ Brussels, St Peter Hosp, Ctr Enter Campylobacter, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
[4] Free Univ Brussels, Queen Fabiola Hosp, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
[5] Free Univ Brussels, Brugmann Hosp, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
[6] Univ Ghent, Fac Sci, Microbiol Lab, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
D O I
10.1089/mdr.2004.10.243
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
The MICs of five antimicrobial agents were determined by the agar dilution method for 98 Arcobacter butzleri and 28 Arcobacter cryaerophilus strains from humans, and poultry. With gentamicin, a MIC of 16 mug/ml was recorded for one A. butzleri strain isolated from poultry, whereas for the other strains MICs ranged from 0.25 to 4 mug/ml. With ciprofloxacin, a bimodal distribution of susceptibility levels was seen for human A. butzleri isolates (0.015-0.03 versus 0.12-0.25), whereas MICs for 65 of the 68 A. butzleri poultry strains ranged from 0.12 to 0.5 mug/ml and three strains from three different broilers were resistant with a MIC of 16 mug/ml. One A. cryaerophilus strain from poultry was resistant to erythromycin at a MIC of 128 mug/ml, whereas MICs for the other Arcobacter strains ranged from 2 to 32 mug/ml. No difference in susceptibility or resistance among the human and poultry strains tested was observed with doxycycline and nalidixic acid. The presence of acquired resistance to erythromycin and ciprofloxacin among poultry isolates is a matter of concern, because the two antimicrobials are generally prescribed as first-line drugs for the treatment of infections with Campylobacteraceae in humans.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 247
页数:5
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Susceptibility of Arcobacter butzleri isolates to 23 antimicrobial agents [J].
Atabay, HI ;
Aydin, F .
LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 33 (06) :430-433
[2]  
deBoer E, 1996, LETT APPL MICROBIOL, V23, P64
[3]  
DEDISTE A, 1998, P 9 INT WORKSH CAP T, P436
[4]   In vitro susceptibility of Arcobacter butzleri and Arcobacter cryaerophilus to different antimicrobial agents [J].
Fera, MT ;
Maugeri, TL ;
Giannone, M ;
Gugliandolo, C ;
La Camera, E ;
Blandino, G ;
Carbone, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2003, 21 (05) :488-491
[5]  
Fernandez H, 1995, ARCH MED VET, V27, P111
[6]   Quality control strains used in susceptibility testing of Campylobacter spp. [J].
Hakanen, A ;
Huovinen, P ;
Kotilainen, P ;
Siitonen, A ;
Jousimies-Somer, H .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2002, 40 (07) :2705-2706
[7]   Identification and characterization of Arcobacter isolates from broilers by biochemical tests, antimicrobial resistance patterns and plasmid analysis [J].
Harrass, B ;
Schwarz, S ;
Wenzel, S .
JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE SERIES B-INFECTIOUS DISEASES AND VETERINARY PUBLIC HEALTH, 1998, 45 (02) :87-94
[8]   Assessment of the genetic diversity among arcobacters isolated from poultry products by using two PCR-based typing methods [J].
Houf, K ;
De Zutter, L ;
Van Hoof, J ;
Vandamme, P .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2002, 68 (05) :2172-2178
[9]   Development of a new protocol for the isolation and quantification of Arcobacter species from poultry products [J].
Houf, K ;
Devriese, LA ;
De Zutter, L ;
Van Hoof, J ;
Vandamme, P .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 71 (2-3) :189-196
[10]  
Houf K, 2000, FEMS MICROBIOL LETT, V193, P89, DOI 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb09407.x