A review of the impact of chemical pretreatment on low-pressure water treatment membranes

被引:73
作者
Farahbakhsh, K [1 ]
Svrcek, C
Guest, RK
Smith, DW
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Sch Engn, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G7, Canada
关键词
microfiltration; ultrafiltration; chemical pretreatment; membrane fouling; natural organic matter; coagulation; clarification; oxidation; contaminant removal; process optimization;
D O I
10.1139/s03-078
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Historically, microfiltration (MF) and ultrafiltration (UF) membranes have been used to remove turbidity, particulate matter, and pathogens. Chemical and physical pretreatment, however, can greatly expand the use of MF and UF membrane systems beyond turbidity and microorganism removal. Both MF and UF membrane systems may be used to remove a variety of chemical contaminants such as arsenic, pesticides, taste and odour, iron, and manganese, provided that the proper water chemistry is attained to convert the contaminants to a particulate form. In addition to enhancing the removal of dissolved contaminants, chemical pretreatment processes such as coagulation have been shown to improve membrane performance by reducing the rate of membrane fouling. Several issues, however, still remain to be resolved before chemical pretreatment can be applied optimally in the water treatment membrane field. These issues include the impact of chemical pretreatment on the performance of membrane systems (i.e., membrane reversible fouling, chemical cleaning frequency), the compatibility of these chemicals with membrane materials, the optimum conditions for chemical pretreatment, and overall cost and benefits of chemical pretreatment to MF and UF membrane systems.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 253
页数:17
相关论文
共 114 条
[21]   The fouling of microfiltration membranes by NOM after coagulation treatment [J].
Carroll, T ;
King, S ;
Gray, SR ;
Bolto, BA ;
Booker, NA .
WATER RESEARCH, 2000, 34 (11) :2861-2868
[22]  
CASTRO K, 1993, J N ENGL WATER WORKS, V107, P199
[23]  
CHANG SD, 1994, P 1994 NAT C ENV ENG, P632
[24]   Removal of natural organic matter (NOM) using ozonation and ultrafiltration [J].
Chang, TC ;
Pan, YW ;
Chen, SS ;
Chen, CK .
MEMBRANES IN DRINKING AND INDUSTRIAL WATER PRODUCTION II, 2001, 1 (5-6) :49-54
[25]  
Chellam S, 1998, J AM WATER WORKS ASS, V90, P96
[26]   Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: factors and mechanisms affecting rejection and flux decline with charged ultrafiltration (UF) membrane [J].
Cho, J ;
Amy, G ;
Pellegrino, J .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2000, 164 (1-2) :89-110
[27]   Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: comparison of flux decline, NOM rejection, and foulants during filtration with three UF membranes [J].
Cho, JW ;
Amy, G ;
Pellegrino, J .
DESALINATION, 2000, 127 (03) :283-298
[28]   Characterization of clean and natural organic matter (NOM) fouled NF and UF membranes, and foulants characterization [J].
Cho, JW ;
Amy, G ;
Pellegrino, J ;
Yoon, YM .
DESALINATION, 1998, 118 (1-3) :101-108
[29]   The impact of conventional water treatment processes on cells of the cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa [J].
Chow, CWK ;
Drikas, M ;
House, J ;
Burch, MD ;
Velzeboer, RMA .
WATER RESEARCH, 1999, 33 (15) :3253-3262
[30]   The effect of ferric chloride flocculation on cyanobacterial cells [J].
Chow, CWK ;
House, J ;
Velzeboer, RMA ;
Drikas, M ;
Burch, MD ;
Steffensen, DA .
WATER RESEARCH, 1998, 32 (03) :808-814