The acquisition of questions with long-distance dependencies

被引:42
作者
Dabrowska, Ewa [1 ]
Rowland, Caroline [2 ]
Theakston, Anna [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Sch English Literature Language & Linguist, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Sch Psychol, Liverpool L69 7ZA, Merseyside, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Sch Psychol Sci, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
language acquisition; long-distance dependencies; questions; complementation; usage-based approaches; COMPLEMENTS;
D O I
10.1515/COGL.2009.025
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
A number of researchers have claimed that questions and other constructions with long distance dependencies (LDDs) are acquired relatively early, by age 4 or even earlier, in spite of their complexity. Analysis of LDD questions in the input available to children suggests that they are extremely stereotypical, raising the possibility that children learn lexically specific templates such as WH do you think S-GAP? rather than general rules of the kind postulated in traditional linguistic accounts of this construction. We describe three elicited imitation experiments with children aged from 4;6 to 6:9 and adult controls. Participants were asked to repeat prototypical questions (i.e., questions which match the hypothesised template), unprototypical questions (which depart from it in several respects) and declarative counterparts of both types of interrogative sentences. The children performed significantly better on the prototypical variants of both constructions, even when both variants contained exactly the same lexical material, while adults showed prototypicality effects for LDD questions only. These results suggest that a general declarative complementation construction emerges quite late in development (after age 6), and that even adults rely on lexically specific templates for LDD questions.
引用
收藏
页码:571 / 597
页数:27
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   The island status of clausal complements: Evidence in favor of an information structure explanation [J].
Ambridge, Ben ;
Goldberg, Adele E. .
COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS, 2008, 19 (03) :357-389
[2]  
[Anonymous], THESIS U MINNESOTA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, CHILDES PROJECT TOOL
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1995, HDB CHILD LANGUAGE A
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, ACQUISITION COMPLEX, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511486531
[6]   ACQUISITION OF COMPLEMENTATION [J].
BLOOM, L ;
RISPOLI, M ;
GARTNER, B ;
HAFITZ, J .
JOURNAL OF CHILD LANGUAGE, 1989, 16 (01) :101-120
[7]  
Bybee J., 2001, PHONOLOGY LANGUAGE U
[8]  
Cheng LLS, 2006, CURR STUD LINGUIST, V42, P1
[9]  
Chomsky Noam., 1977, Formal Syntax, DOI DOI 10.1044/JSHR.2003.574
[10]  
Culicover PeterW., 1997, PRINCIPLES PARAMETER