Biological assessment and criteria improve total maximum daily load decision making

被引:64
作者
Karr, JR
Yoder, CO
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Midw Biodivers Inst, Columbus, OH 43221 USA
[3] Ctr Appl Bioassessment & Biocriteria, Columbus, OH 43221 USA
关键词
water quality; decision making; biological properties; monitoring;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2004)130:6(594)
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Mandated total maximum daily load (TMDL) analyses present an excellent opportunity to restore the nation's degraded waters. The current norm for TMDL practice is, however; unlikely to achieve this goal without improved water quality standards plus systematic monitoring and assessment using biological criteria. Better than chemical and physical criteria alone, biological criteria link human actions, their impacts on water bodies, and societal goals, which are expressed as designated uses. To be adequate, monitoring should improve understanding of the connections among stressor, exposure, and response gradients. Water quality standards, monitoring, and assessment can improve water resources because they track water body condition, not the number of TMDLs completed. Federal and state leadership must set policy goals, as required by the Clean Water Act, and provide adequate fiscal and professional resources. States with high-quality programs should serve as models. Administrators should use the advances made in 2 decades of water resource science to improve their water management programs. Without such improvements, those involved in the TMDL process will continue to be frustrated, and the nation's waters will continue to decline.
引用
收藏
页码:594 / 604
页数:11
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1987, BIOL CRIT PROT AQ LI
[3]  
[Anonymous], BIOL ASSESSMENT CRIT
[4]  
[Anonymous], FWSOBS8406
[5]  
[Anonymous], 230R96007 EPA
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1992, REST AQ EC SCI TECHN
[7]  
[Anonymous], BIOL CRIT PROT AQ LI
[8]   Development of a bird integrity index: Using bird assemblages as indicators of riparian condition [J].
Bryce, SA ;
Hughes, RM ;
Kaufmann, PR .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2002, 30 (02) :294-310
[9]  
Courtemanch D. L., 1995, BIOL ASSESSMENT CRIT, P315
[10]  
DAVIES SP, 1995, MAINE BIOL MONITORIN