Comparative efficacy and potency of ipratropium via Turbuhaler(R) and pressurized metered-dose inhaler in reversible airflow obstruction

被引:5
作者
Bollert, FGE [1 ]
Matusiewicz, SP [1 ]
Dewar, MH [1 ]
Brown, GM [1 ]
McLean, A [1 ]
Greening, AP [1 ]
Crompton, GK [1 ]
机构
[1] ASTRA CLIN RES UNIT, EDINBURGH, MIDLOTHIAN, SCOTLAND
关键词
asthma; ipratropium; maximal expiratory flow rate; nebulizers; vaporizers;
D O I
10.1183/09031936.97.10081824
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Ipratropium bromide (IB), typically delivered by pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI), is used to treat patients with reversible airways obstruction, Use of the pMDI, unlike the Turbuhaler(R) (TH), demands co-ordination of actuation with inspiration for efficient use. Two studies were carried out to compare the relative efficacy and potency of IB delivered by TH or pMDI. Both studies were of a randomized, double-blind and cross-over design. For the efficacy study, 15 patients received a cumulative dose of 160 mu g IB via TH or pMDI as doses of 20, 20, 40 and 80 mu g at 45 min intervals on two days. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was measured prior to and 40 min after dosing. For the potency study, 33 patients received 10, 20 or 40 mu g of IB via TH, 20 mu g IB via pMDI, or placebo, on five days, FEV1 was recorded prior to and 15-360 min after dosing. For the efficacy study, there was no difference in FEV1 response to a cumulative dose of DB via pMDI and TH, More than 80% of the maximum effect was seen at the lowest dose (20 mu g of IB). Regarding the potency study, the FEV1 response to 20 mu g IB administered via pMDI was similar to that of 10 mu g via TH; 20 mu g via TH was significantly more effective than 20 mu g via pMDI (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the efficacy study showed that maximum FEV1 occurred at low doses of IB, negating any opportunity to identify differences between devices, The potency study indicated that the 10 mu g dose via TH was of similar efficacy to the 20 mu g dose via pMDI, confirming an efficacy ratio of 1.5-2.0:1 for the TH device.
引用
收藏
页码:1824 / 1828
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   IMPORTANCE OF THE INHALATION DEVICE ON THE EFFECT OF BUDESONIDE [J].
AGERTOFT, L ;
PEDERSEN, S .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 1993, 69 (01) :130-133
[2]  
ALLEN IC, 1979, THORAX, V34, P137
[3]   The inhalation device influences lung deposition and bronchodilating effect of terbutaline [J].
Borgstrom, L ;
Derom, E ;
Stahl, E ;
WahlinBoll, E ;
Pauwels, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1996, 153 (05) :1636-1640
[4]  
CROMPTON GK, 1982, EUR J RESPIR DIS, V63, P101
[5]  
EKSTROM T, 1995, ANN ALLERG ASTHMA IM, V74, P328
[6]   CLINICAL COMPARISON OF INHALED BUDESONIDE DELIVERED EITHER VIA PRESSURIZED METERED DOSE INHALER OR TURBUHALER [J].
ENGEL, T ;
HEINIG, JH ;
MALLING, HJ ;
SCHARLING, B ;
NIKANDER, K ;
MADSEN, F .
ALLERGY, 1989, 44 (03) :220-225
[7]  
GROSS NJ, 1987, POSTGRAD MED J, V63, P29
[8]  
HOCKLEY B, BR J DIS CHEST, V79, P379
[9]  
HOLGATE ST, 1987, POSTGRAD MED J, V63, P35
[10]   TERBUTALINE VIA PRESSURIZED METERED-DOSE INHALED (P-MDI) AND TURBUHALER(R) IN HIGHLY REACTIVE ASTHMATIC-PATIENTS [J].
JACKSON, L ;
STAHL, E ;
HOLGATE, ST .
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 1994, 7 (09) :1598-1601