Characteristics of breast carcinomas missed by screening radiologists

被引:80
作者
Goergen, SK
Evans, J
Cohen, GPB
MacMillan, JH
机构
[1] MONASH BREASTSCREEN,MELBOURNE,VIC,AUSTRALIA
[2] MONASH UNIV,DEPT SOCIAL & PREVENT MED,MELBOURNE,VIC 3004,AUSTRALIA
关键词
breast neoplasms; diagnosis; breast radiography; diagnostic radiology; observer performance;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.204.1.9205234
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To determine whether breast cancers missed at screening mammography have distinguishing characteristics from those of detected cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The mammograms of 146 women with mammographically identifiable breast cancer were viewed independently by two radiologists who were blinded as to whether the cancer had been missed or detected (group 1 lesions, missed cancers; group 2 lesions, detected cancers) at screening. The mammographic lesions were characterized as to location, size, density, type, and visibility on two views. RESULTS: A significant difference between missed and detected cancers was found for diameter (P = .03), number of views (P < .0017), and density (P = .0007). Stepwise multivariable logistic regression showed that density (P = .01) and the number of views (P = .03) but not diameter (P = .27) were independently significant in distinguishing the groups. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups for lesion type (P = .32 for reader 1 and P = .27 for reader 2) or location (P = .86 for reader 1 and P > .96 for reader 2). CONCLUSION: Missed cancers were statistically significantly lower in density and more often seen on only one of two views than detected cancers.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 135
页数:5
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   THE EFFICACY OF DOUBLE READING MAMMOGRAMS IN BREAST SCREENING [J].
ANDERSON, EDC ;
MUIR, BB ;
WALSH, JS ;
KIRKPATRICK, AE .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1994, 49 (04) :248-251
[2]  
ATTINEN I, 1993, CLIN RADIOL, V48, P414
[3]   SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY OF 1ST SCREEN MAMMOGRAPHY IN THE CANADIAN NATIONAL BREAST SCREENING STUDY - A PRELIMINARY-REPORT FROM 5 CENTERS [J].
BAINES, CJ ;
MILLER, AB ;
WALL, C ;
MCFARLANE, DV ;
SIMOR, IS ;
JONG, R ;
SHAPIRO, BJ ;
AUDET, L ;
PETITCLERC, M ;
OUIMETOLIVA, D ;
LADOUCEUR, J ;
HEBERT, G ;
MINUK, T ;
HARDY, G ;
STANDING, HK .
RADIOLOGY, 1986, 160 (02) :295-298
[4]   ANALYSIS OF CANCERS MISSED AT SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY [J].
BIRD, RE ;
WALLACE, TW ;
YANKASKAS, BC .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 184 (03) :613-617
[5]   QUALITY-ORIENTED MASS MAMMOGRAPHY SCREENING [J].
BURHENNE, LJW ;
BURHENNE, HJ ;
KAN, L .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 194 (01) :185-188
[7]   BREAST-CANCER SCREENING - AN APPRAISAL [J].
KIRKPATRICK, AE .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1991, 43 (02) :75-76
[8]   THE SWEDISH 2 COUNTY TRIAL OF MAMMOGRAPHIC SCREENING FOR BREAST-CANCER - RECENT RESULTS AND CALCULATION OF BENEFIT [J].
TABAR, L ;
FAGERBERG, G ;
DUFFY, SW ;
DAY, NE .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1989, 43 (02) :107-114
[9]   REDUCTION IN MORTALITY FROM BREAST-CANCER AFTER MASS-SCREENING WITH MAMMOGRAPHY [J].
TABAR, L ;
GAD, A ;
HOLMBERG, LH ;
LJUNGQUIST, U ;
EKLUND, G ;
FAGERBERG, CJG ;
BALDETORP, L ;
GRONTOFT, O ;
LUNDSTROM, B ;
MANSON, JC ;
DAY, NE ;
PETTERSSON, F .
LANCET, 1985, 1 (8433) :829-832